Advantage/ disadvantage
In today’s modern world, children, as a rule, have multiple numbers of various toys bought by their parents. There are many positive and negative effects that toys can have on the children. I, however, believe that the merits outstrip the demerits.
On the positive side, playing with such goods as the toys are, is beneficial for a child’s cognitive development. It supports enhancing infant’s imagination. Having tremendous number of realistic toys will make the child’s choice of his/her preference come true. And this not only makes the child happier, but also enables the parents to have an initial idea on what profession will the child use in the future. For example, in Armenia there is a special event in the families called “atamhatic”, where the child is placed in the middle of a variety of toys and his future profession is “predicted” based on his choice of the toy associated with a certain type of business.
Furthermore, playing with large number of toys has its advantage also for the health. Different toys require different movements, thus resulting in the involvement of varous muscles of a child. Moreover, they support also to the development of such important skills, as the motor skills, visual and spatial skills are.
On the downside, however, it is commonly said that the excess number of toys, more often than not, replace other crusial compontents in child’s life, as the books are. Reading books is irreplaceable in terms of information that may have lifelong importance. What is more, as most of the toys are created to entertain the child alone, they do not support to the development of socialising skills in the child.
To sum up, it is irrefutable that having large number of toys is beneficial for the child and its pros definitely overweigh the cons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-30 | hakobyan04.07 | 11 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, for example, to sum up, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1548.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10751776611 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546666666667 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9357642633 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.2 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0170034349848 0.244688304435 7% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00848393246732 0.084324248473 10% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0317439685852 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0125073816722 0.151304729494 8% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250147633443 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.