TPO 48
In the set of materials, the reading passage talk about frog extinctions and their causes and some solution for them and the listening passage talks about the same issue.
according to the readings passage author talks about some solution that can prevent the frogs from extinction. first, some of the frogs harmed from pesticides that applying by farmers on the land. laws prohibited farmers to use pesticides. second, they want to apply the treatment on the fungus because fungus causes to some harm on frogs and the last one is because the water is frogs habitat and they lay their egg in the water they decided to prevent the waters from human activity.
according to the lecture, the professor thinks the argument that reading passage discussed are not convincing. she provides some solution to retort the author's claims. she thinks the first solution that reading passage argued is not economically for farmers and farmland because this work has some disadvantage and decrease the number of crops and farmland, therefore the first claim of the reading passage is proved unconvincing. second, is not a good solution because this treat must apply individually to each of them. I meant they must capture each of fungus and apply the treatment although that can’t grant the next generation, so the writing’s second idea is rebutted. Third, this work can be practical true because human activity has little effect on water and the biggest cause of this problem is global warming, thus reliably retorted the last idea of reading passage.
To sum it all up by taking all the detail into consideration the solution that reading passage argued about is not convincing and practically possible to prevent the frog from extinction.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: According
... passage talks about the same issue. according to the readings passage author talks ab...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 112, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
... can prevent the frogs from extinction. first, some of the frogs harmed from pesticid...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 119, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...event the frogs from extinction. first, some of the frogs harmed from pesticides that apply...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 198, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Laws
...s that applying by farmers on the land. laws prohibited farmers to use pesticides. s...
^^^^
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Second
...s prohibited farmers to use pesticides. second, they want to apply the treatment on th...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: According
...vent the waters from human activity. according to the lecture, the professor thinks th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 112, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...g passage discussed are not convincing. she provides some solution to retort the au...
^^^
Line 5, column 169, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
... solution to retort the authors claims. she thinks the first solution that reading ...
^^^
Line 5, column 432, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Second
...reading passage is proved unconvincing. second, is not a good solution because this tr...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, so, therefore, third, thus, i mean
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 286.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1048951049 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59697721868 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486013986014 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 441.0 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.23620309051 24% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.0585500379 49.2860985944 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.666666667 110.228320801 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 21.698381199 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06452816374 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262623936801 0.272083759551 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108841278069 0.0996497079465 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109511239547 0.0662205650399 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180018182827 0.162205337803 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142975893822 0.0443174109184 323% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.