The table shows the number of employees and factories producing silk in England and Wales between 1851 and 1901.
Link table: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bN1Kakm812OcI3ntl5QQlne_RNQC5d_M/view?…
Answer:
The given table indicates information about how many workers and silk’s manufactories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901. Overall, there was a sharp decrease in the number of silk employers of two countries over the period and it can be seen from the table that more women were employed than men in this industry. Likewise, in spite of some small fluctuations, the figures for silk’s factories increased over the 50 year period.
With respect to the table, in 1851, the silk workforce accounted for the highest amount of employees with 137,500, including 76,786 female and 53,964 male. By contrast, the figures for silk factories was lowest, at only 272. However, after a decade, the number of silk manufacture factories experienced a tripled grow, surged to 761, while there was a substantial decline of over than 20000 people in total workers.
Over the followings 40 years, the total number of male and female employed in silk industry of England and Wales experienced an enormous fall, plummeted to 13375 and 25567, respectively. Meanwhile, the number of silk factories in these 2 countries declined over 40 years, falling to 623 at the end of the period.
Word count: 195
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-02 | chickenbound | 78 | view |
| 2019-06-02 | chickenbound | 78 | view |
- The table shows the number of employees and factories producing silk in England and Wales between 1851 and 1901.Link table: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bN1Kakm812OcI3ntl5QQlne_RNQC5d_M/view?u... 78
- The table shows the number of employees and factories producing silk in England and Wales between 1851 and 1901.Link table: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bN1Kakm812OcI3ntl5QQlne_RNQC5d_M/view?u... 78
- The bar graph shows the global sales (in billions of dollars) of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, likewise, so, while, in spite of, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1015.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10050251256 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72341411092 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592964824121 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1481725789 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.777777778 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207948468903 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837486087389 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461589620906 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141211579837 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0172532703712 0.0819641961636 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.