Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to get a satisfying in their career life than those who frequently change jobs.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
People are always passionate about their job. A recent decade are witness of development in the commercial sector. Amid this development, there is one phenomenon that has associated with it. According to this phenomenon, some please advocate that they should pursue in that job what they are doing while the notion of rest if people is to change the job often give them satisfaction. I will try to throw light upon both perspective are crucial among citizens. I will try to posit my view about it.
To commence with, there are multifarious reason to shore those people who are in favor of working for single profession has more benefits. The predominant reason is that people are more interested and passionate by their career. To justify, people who prefer to get a job in earlier life and for a long time they have joined with that company because it gives him more satisfaction. Also , they feel familiar with their job. The another main reason relate to them family. To explain, employee have not intended to put their family in hazardous situation with alternate job which led financial problem introvert family. This may also result in that people have to travel due to change their position and they can not leave stable life as well as their children also find it difficult and they are more likely to live isolated and less interact with family relation.
On the other side of spectrum, there are several reasons for changing job frequently has felt them more energetic and it gain their enthusiasm. In addition, faction of outfits are very passionate to change their job and defeat the risk every time because they may led to improve profound knowledge and skill perhaps, that would give them more job opportunity in work. Furthermore, people can learn more from community likewise social interaction or the value of all the culture and tradition. While, Changing job has offered the chance of making new friends, it may led to acquire more experience with all field.
Aggelomerating, all the points I elaborated an above it can be concluded that stick with one office has more benefits which would like to give a chance of promotion in job prospect. In order to change the job may have filled the admiration of people. That is why, I support that declaration connected to both view. It is more fruitful in my opinion.
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015. 73
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010. 84
- The table below gives information about UK independent films 50
- Some people say taxes should be spent on health care. Other people say that there are more important priorities for tax-payers' money. Discus both these views and give your own opinion. 73
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled tea and pineapples in 2010 and 2015 in five European countries. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...use it gives him more satisfaction. Also , they feel familiar with their job. The ...
^^
Line 5, column 122, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'gains'?
Suggestion: gains
...tly has felt them more energetic and it gain their enthusiasm. In addition, faction ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, likewise, may, so, thus, well, while, in addition, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 24.0651302605 199% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1938.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 399.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85714285714 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58761956246 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 623.7 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.0552018171 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2857142857 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261390233565 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757795414228 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638878170417 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149747557747 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0502970768797 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.