There were two studies of reading habbits of Waymarsh citizens represented in this statement. The first one was based on the survey of the citizens' respondence which showed their preference on literary classics. However, the local library borrowing data based study showed that the people in this place preferred mysery novel. Hence the author concluded that the respondece based survey had made a wrong conclusion on the reading habbits of the Waymarsh citizens. While the author's conclusion is not convincing, there are some loopholes in the statement ,we need to reexamine them carefully.
To begin with, the people invovled in these two researchemay be not the same group. The author does not mention whehter the people interviewed in the first study were also the exactly same ones studied in the second study. Thus the data from the two studies may not be convicing as they presented the habbits of different groups of people. Moreover, even if they were the same people, the author does not tell us how much of them takes part in the total Waymarsh citizens, in that maybe there were just few people participated in the studies which could not show the whole condition.
In addition, whether the result of the first study true or not was still in question. In that people may not tell the truth when they were asked about private infromation like reading habbits. Maybe they merely wanted to show their comparable high level reading habbits by telling they were in fond of classics while actually they would like to read these mythtery novels for fun. Thus the data of the two studies were not accurate.
Finally, wheher the researching method of the scecond study proper was still in question. As we were not aware of that how did the people in Waymarsh read books in generall, there are lots of way of reading today, by e-books, on PCs and cellphones buying books or borrowing books. Thus the data from the library may be not acurrate due to the reading methods metioned above. So the conlusion of the second study was not convicing.
Coclusively, the author's opinion of the statement is not compelling as there were some reasonings were not logical and practical. To furhter the study, the author should get to know the main method of reading in this place, then focusing on this field to develop deep study of people as well as their preference in reading.Once foused the field, the data except for the respondence of people may be more accurate because people may not tell the truth when they get an interview.
- The following appeared as part of an article in a business magazine. "A recent study rating 300 male and female advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep the 42
- It is sometimes said that borrowing money from a friend can harm or damage the friendship. Do you agree? Why or why not? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer. 60
- The following appeared in a memorandum written by the vice president of Health Naturally, a small but expanding chain of stores selling health food and other health-related products."Our previous experience has been that our stores are most profitabl 55
- People can solve important problems in their daily life on their own or with the help from families The help from the government is no necessary Agree or disagree 65
- Two years ago, radio station WCQP in Rockville decided to increase the number of call-in advice programs that it broadcast; since that time, its share of the radio audience in the Rockville listening area has increased significantly. Given WCQP's recent s 59
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 434 350
No. of Characters: 2052 1500
No. of Different Words: 192 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.564 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.728 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.34 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 134 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 99 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 63 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 37 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.842 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 12.795 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.842 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.341 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.544 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.087 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'citizens'' or 'citizen's'?
Suggestion: citizens'; citizen's
...irst one was based on the survey of the citizens respondence which showed their preferen...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 328, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...e in this place preferred mysery novel. Hence the author concluded that the respondec...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 476, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ts of the Waymarsh citizens. While the authors conclusion is not convincing, there are...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 555, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...here are some loopholes in the statement ,we need to reexamine them carefully. ...
^^
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xamine them carefully. To begin with, the people invovled in these two researc...
^^
Line 3, column 225, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... same ones studied in the second study. Thus the data from the two studies may not b...
^^^^
Line 5, column 382, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... to read these mythtery novels for fun. Thus the data of the two studies were not ac...
^^^^
Line 7, column 282, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...phones buying books or borrowing books. Thus the data from the library may be not ac...
^^^^
Line 7, column 382, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e reading methods metioned above. So the conlusion of the second study was not co...
^^
Line 9, column 18, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... was not convicing. Coclusively, the authors opinion of the statement is not compell...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 324, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Once
... as well as their preference in reading.Once foused the field, the data except for t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, finally, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, still, then, thus, well, while, except for, in addition, in general, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.6327345309 112% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 11.1786427146 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 28.8173652695 90% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 55.5748502994 108% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 16.3942115768 79% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2102.0 2260.96107784 93% => OK
No of words: 433.0 441.139720559 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8545034642 5.12650576532 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.56307096286 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44788007689 2.78398813304 88% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 204.123752495 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.461893764434 0.468620217663 99% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 705.55239521 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.22255489022 166% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.3151001506 57.8364921388 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.631578947 119.503703932 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7894736842 23.324526521 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.10526315789 5.70786347227 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 5.25449101796 209% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.67664670659 235% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261686527514 0.218282227539 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0900680870648 0.0743258471296 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522249175952 0.0701772020484 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157692693421 0.128457276422 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044006557981 0.0628817314937 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.3799401198 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.3550499002 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.5979740519 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.32208582834 99% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 98.500998004 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.