The pie chart elucidates how middle-income families spend their household budget in the two different years i.e. 2000 and 2010.
Overall, In the year 2000, the highest proportion of income expend by the households on housing, they prefer to have a better living. Secondly, the lowest proportion of the whole money was spent on miscellaneous expenses which are only about 15%. The other two categories, food & clothes and vacations & leisure shared a similar ratio of money, stay up to 25%.
While, In the year 2010, the choice of households changed drastically, the percentage of spending over housing facility gets increased by 15%. In this addition, people want to go for more shopping to buy clothes and taste a variety of foods, this ratio has grown by 10%. In contrast, vacation trips faced 15% of downfall in their proportion which states people do not as much prefer to go on leisure. Lastly, the miscellaneous expenses were also decreased by 10%, shows people start saving money.
In conclusion, money spend on miscellaneous expenses and on vacations goes down and by this, people start saving money to spend on having a good standard of living in terms of buying luxurious housing facility, food, and clothes.
- overpopulation in the urban areas has led to generate many problems. write out one or two serious problems and give the suggestions to tackle out by the individual and government. 11
- In some countries, the high rates of crimes are committed by teenagers. why this has happened? the effects of the happenings. 84
- There is huge increase in the size of cities. Many cities have grown in a haphazard way why is careful planning important in the development of cities? 56
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.Discuss both these views and give yo 67
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1024.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06930693069 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72037183382 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628712871287 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9921116186 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.777777778 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11111111111 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147723122664 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692205757142 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114042563736 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130940884946 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.148015006633 0.0819641961636 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.