changes in annual spending by a particular UK in 1981, 1991, and 2001
The pie chart gives information about the changes in annual expenditure by a particular UK school in two decades specifically in 1981, 1991, and 2001. There were 5 sectors will be figured out which measured in percentage. Overall, as can be seen that the most positive movement is obstructively in teachers’ salaries category whilst the most dropped down trend dramatically happened to be in worker salaries sector.
Regarding to the data, from 1981 to 1991 the most sharply increased trend had to be in teachers’ salaries category which made up to 10%. The second most rose trend depleted in usual resources category such as books and other needs that grew up to 5%. It is also followed by the percentage of school obligation obviously in insurance expense which slightly went up to 1%. In contrast, there was the most declined trend in this decade happened to be in furniture and equipment category which got down to 10%. Besides, same case as in worker salaries expenditure which thoroughly as the most decreased expense over the charts went down to 6% respectively.
On the other decade, especially in 2001 as the end year of the timescale, unlike the former decade, the most sharply climbed happened to be in furniture and equipment sector. Then it followed by insurance expense which incrementally rose up tp 5%. Different to the former sector, the most dipped down had to be in resource spending at 11%. The second highest dropped down category was in worker salaries that gradually fell down to 7% and accumulated with the former decade this trend became the most decreased sector over the charts. It is also followed by teacher salaries sector which got down to 5% obviously.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- Currently there is a trend towards the use of alternative forms of medicine 73
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 78
- young people are thrusted to work or travel for a year in their transition time after highschool to collage 67
- Rail transport in four countries in 2007 67
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 405, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'salaries'' or 'salary's'?
Suggestion: salaries'; salary's
...d dramatically happened to be in worker salaries sector. Regarding to the data, from...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 188, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
...econd most rose trend depleted in usual resources category such as books and other needs ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 545, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'salaries'' or 'salary's'?
Suggestion: salaries'; salary's
...to 10%. Besides, same case as in worker salaries expenditure which thoroughly as the mos...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, regarding, second, so, then, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 33.7804878049 172% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 965.302439024 147% => OK
No of words: 285.0 196.424390244 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96842105263 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80099353608 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484210526316 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 437.4 283.868780488 154% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0789621219 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.923076923 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9230769231 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23076923077 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113669656378 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.04908718098 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119477714624 0.0843802449381 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0960620500863 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.087044415853 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.