Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

During the history, teachers have had a momentous issue in the community, and it goes without saying that they should be in welfare. Nowadays, because the knowledge changes to an critical issue in the life of people, teachers should pay more attention to it than past. To achieve this, they must have comfort situation in their life and work place. It's crystal clear that the people are in better position than past, and in what follows, I will substantiate my claims about it.

First of all, teachers have more welfare than past in their class, and more equipments are given them for teaching, such as projectors, laptops, white bourds. For eaxample, I was a student sixteen years ago. By that time, teachers were not in good comfort because there were just a few teacher in my school, and they should teach from morning until evening for both elementry and basic students. But, now there are many teachers in schools, which causes teachers being home in the afternoon for take little nap. Thus, not only hiring many teachers causes an increase in the number of employed people, but it also bring about much welfare for teachers.

Secondly, teachers have many institutions for their rights. So, if there is a protest for their rights, these institutions could orginize the teachers, and by this, their letter will reach to governments and parliament's representatives. Last year, government did not increase teachers' salary, for instance. So they decided to accumulate in front of the parliament and showed their opposite about this decission. But, this could not be successful without a powerful intitution. Their institution collected teachers signatures, and representatives had to prevent government from keeping teachers' salary constant. Therefore, they can take their rights from politics, and cease them from illegal decissions.

To conclude, even though the comfort of teachers can improve in future, now they are valued by community than they were past.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-10 Sarrraaa 68 view
2020-01-08 3dra 70 view
2020-01-03 wang kuan huan 73 view
2020-01-03 wang kuan huan 70 view
2019-12-19 bishal sitaula 68 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Ali_PRSDT :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...adays, because the knowledge changes to an critical issue in the life of people, t...
^^
Line 3, column 283, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun teacher seems to be countable; consider using: 'few teachers'.
Suggestion: few teachers
... good comfort because there were just a few teacher in my school, and they should teach fro...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 614, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'brings'?
Suggestion: brings
... number of employed people, but it also bring about much welfare for teachers. Sec...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 62, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ugh the comfort of teachers can improve in future, now they are valued by community than ...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for instance, such as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1653.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 319.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18181818182 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66603316276 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570532915361 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7725366463 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2352941176 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7647058824 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64705882353 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168756861625 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586185129716 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555599761823 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131397290644 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561913455257 0.0645574589148 87% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.