The pictorial image illustrates the recycling of water with the help of natural sources in various steps.
The process began with drain impure water in the plastic vessel through a container with hand. Whereas, the barrel keep above the storage drum for a better flow of clean water. Meanwhile, to filter the water from the sand, charcoal and gravel barrel should put on equalizer stable level and the density level will help out to separate sand, charcoal, and gravel from water.
On the other hand, on extra storage pot located below the plastic vessel, which is connected through a pipe where all pure water stored. Moreover, both barrels are packed with a plastic lid to keep away from dust. Finally, the dirty water is now ready to consume as drinking water.
Overall, the process is short and simple where it began with pouring water in the plastic barrel to end up with clean water.
- Many people believe that family has a greater influence on a child s life and development compared to other factors such as friends TV music and so on Do you agree or disagree with this statement 71
- Speed camera fines and road accident fatalities in Britain. 78
- the diagram below shows a simple system that turns dirty water into clean water. 61
- Speed camera fines and road accident fatalities in Britain. 61
- Some people enjoy change, and they look forward to new experiences. Others like their lives to stay the same, and they do not change their usual habits. Compare these two approaches to life. Which approach do you prefer? Explain why. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 126, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...stic barrel to end up with clean water.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, moreover, so, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 745.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83766233766 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.11995832722 2.65546596893 80% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3619025836 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.125 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273757557648 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13243235647 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0835466231391 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176059656537 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515283527983 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.