Medical technology helps to live long life. Is that curse or blessing for society and mankind.
Surely there has been no time in history where lives of people have changed more dramatically. A quick reflection on typical day reveals that medical science the modern technology in medical increasing the life expectancy across the world has been of the prominent topics in the contemporary discussion. People have always been intrigued to analyze and explain modern medicine helps to live longer. I will discuss my viewpoint in upcoming paragraphs.
To begin with, there are certain reasons behind the medical automation. The first viewpoint in my mind that the modern medicines for having a profound effect on the mankind. The most conspicuous one is that the current medication empowers doctors to prevent diseases by finding it very early. Not only new advanced equipment helps doctor to go in the right direction to cure a disease, but intelligent people in the world also live a long life, and they help others for a long time through creative things.
However, facet of the argument is that the older population is increasing in the country. This could have an adverse economic effect in the developing countries. Few medicines are addictive for some people, so they cannot live without it and take all their lives.
Before putting my pen down I would like to say that medical science helps to live long life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-28 | Navneet dhillon | 55 | view |
| 2019-06-28 | Nobal hundal | 55 | view |
- Give your opinion whether formal written examination is an effective way to assess students 84
- use of credit card. advantages and disadvantages. 80
- There are social medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phone do you agree that the problems out weigh the benefits of the mobile phone. 77
- credit card uses by middle class people. generally people have conflicting views regarding the advantages and its disadvantages. discuss the topic and give your opinion. 55
- xenophobia has accelerated rapidly in the western countries. According to you what causes and solution in this problem? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Before” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ve without it and take all their lives. Before putting my pen down I would like to say...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1103.0 1207.87684729 91% => OK
No of words: 220.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01363636364 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62062307272 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631818181818 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 351.9 379.143842365 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4896180182 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.9166666667 104.977214359 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.9669160288 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.25397266985 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312206556021 0.242375264174 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0901591709485 0.0925447433944 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829668390247 0.071462118173 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184151859878 0.151781067708 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0844680669133 0.0609392437508 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 12.6369458128 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.5310837438 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 55.0591133005 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.