The tradition of families getting together to eat meals is disappearing.
What are the reasons?
What are the impacts?
Nowadays, there is an increasing in tendency that family members do not have a meal together. In this essay, I will examine the reasons why this traditional practice has changed and its effects.
Several causes of a disappearance of family’s meals can be outlined. For one thing, the people’s lifestyle is different from their routines and working schedules. Some companies provide their employees flexible working hours resulting in a variation of the time they have to go to their office. As a result, each family members have a different time of their meals due to a difference in occupations and organizations they work for. What is more, many restaurants with a variety of food types are located in all areas of the city facilitating people’s lifestyle for eating in any places and any time they want. Accordingly, it is more convenient to have a meal nearing office, or places they go. It can be compared to the past that there are less restaurants and people have to go back home for meals prepared by family.
Without a family meals gives a rise to some possible impacts. First, the family’s bond might be weak from less in communication to each other. This is because one of the most important proposes of having a family’s meal is to share experiences, and discuss helping for deep understand in each other. Another effects would be a higher in family’s expenditure due to seperated meals instead of sharing the meals together. Since the restaurants of food providers charge their customers not only the food costs, but also service charges as well as parking fees, the costs are higher in an individual while it could be shared among family members.
In conclusion, in my opinion, I think the reasons why people have their meals without family are mainly caused by their different in lifestyles which could have an impact on a healthy relationship within family member.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-29 | pandaree.r | 73 | view |
- Competitiveness is a positive quality for people in most societies How does competitiveness affect individuals Is it a positive or negative trend 81
- The pie charts show the results of a survey conducted by a university on the opinions of full time and part time students about its services 79
- Nowadays, most people try to balance between work and other part of lives. Unfortunately, not many achieve this balance.What are the problems of this? Suggest some solutions to solve the problem? 67
- For schoolchildren, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Many university students live with their families, while others live away from home because their universities are in different places.What are the advantages and disadvantages both situations. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... practice has changed and its effects. Several causes of a disappearance of fam...
^^^
Line 3, column 758, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun restaurants is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... be compared to the past that there are less restaurants and people have to go back ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ack home for meals prepared by family. Without a family meals gives a rise to s...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... could be shared among family members. In conclusion, in my opinion, I think th...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, if, so, well, while, i think, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, for one thing, in my opinion, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.015625 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92806997013 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5375 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4578167069 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53333333333 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193125734841 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688253019767 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409955154814 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123075697569 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0139514677298 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.