We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.
Human interaction enables us to learn from each other's experiences and perspectives. it is true that we learn from people whose views we share, but contrairy to the statement above, which says that we learn "much more" from those whose views we share, huamans have the capability to learn more from those whose views contradict our own. this holds true as long as there is mutual respect and peace in the interaction between both parties.
First of all, learning is not the equivalent of changing; one is able to learn about another point of view without changing their position on the subject matter. Take the example of the paradoxical views of the politically conservative and the politcally liberal. Historically, these two groups speak ill of each other and hold opposite opinions when it comes to politically charged subjects such as same sex marriage and immigrant rights. if two people, one who is liberal and one who is conservative, talk about same sex marriage or immigrant rights in a civil manner, then they will learn something new about the other's perspective. In this example, they will learned something that they might have not learned if they were talking to other people that hold the same views.
Secondly, "views" does not need to pertain to morality. For example, individuals working on a group project for school or work can benefit from each other and create a superior product if they have contradictory views. different views bring different ideas to the table, and after each member is heard and acknowledged, the team can bounce ideas off each other until they reach a consensus on how to tackle the project at hand. In comparison, when a team is comprised of individuals that have the same views on how to tackle the project, then there is little to no room for creative solutions and the efficiency of project development will not be as high as it could be.
some critics of my view would state that one learns more from someone with similar values becuase it is burdensome to speak to and reach a consensus with someone with contradicting views. while this might hold true in some cases, this argument pertains to respect and open-mindness and has nothing to do with leanring from someone else. using the examples above, if someone that is liberal does not listen and respect the opinion of someone that is conservative, then they will come to a standstill and the conversation will be unproductive. To remedy this problem, one must always respect the opinions of another becuase while one might not agree, one can always learn.
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- The following appeared as a letter to the editor from a Central Plaza store owner."Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Ce 55
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 66
- We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 86, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ch others experiences and perspectives. it is true that we learn from people whose...
^^
Line 1, column 348, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...m those whose views contradict our own. this holds true as long as there is mutual r...
^^^^
Line 1, column 450, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n the interaction between both parties. First of all, learning is not the equiva...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 441, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...same sex marriage and immigrant rights. if two people, one who is liberal and one ...
^^
Line 3, column 553, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a civil manner" with adverb for "civil"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...t same sex marriage or immigrant rights in a civil manner, then they will learn something new abo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 617, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...they will learn something new about the others perspective. In this example, they will...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 664, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'learn'
Suggestion: learn
...perspective. In this example, they will learned something that they might have not lear...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 230, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Different
...oduct if they have contradictory views. different views bring different ideas to the tabl...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 466, Rule ID: IS_COMPRISED_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of' or 'is composed of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of; is composed of
...ect at hand. In comparison, when a team is comprised of individuals that have the same views on...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 682, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent will not be as high as it could be. some critics of my view would state that...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...ill not be as high as it could be. some critics of my view would state that one...
^^^^
Line 7, column 189, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
... with someone with contradicting views. while this might hold true in some cases, thi...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 338, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Using
... to do with leanring from someone else. using the examples above, if someone that is ...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ight not agree, one can always learn.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, while, as to, for example, such as, first of all, in some cases, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2156.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 436.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94495412844 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56953094068 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72210121611 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477064220183 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 661.5 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0137424643 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.75 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 23.4991977007 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 5.21951772744 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 7.80617977528 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33628785834 0.243740707755 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0949569182186 0.0831039109588 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.170437059812 0.0758088955206 225% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222851285116 0.150359130593 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.231015247266 0.0667264976115 346% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.8420337079 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.1743820225 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.