he effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Healthy citizens creates a healthy country. To make a country better, leaders should give priority to the well beings of its citizens.
Every leader aims for the developement and welfare of the country. Leaders who are praised and idealised for the work they have done are those, under whom leadership, the condition of citizens had become better. For ex, Mahatma Gandhi known as Bapu regarded as a paragoan of leadership, worked for the welfare of people. Mahatma Gandhi, disturbed to see the oppresion of Indains by Britishers, fought a non-voilent war against britishers.
Furthermore, There are leaders who had looked to increase the power of country by conquering other countries or increase military power but the leaders who are most effetive looked to ameliorate the situation of common man. For example, leader of Korea is critizised as he just want to increase the power of korea at any cost, while Indain leader Narendra Modi is praised as he more interest in uplifting common man.
Moreover, healthy citizens means better workfore, less diseases, less economic gap which will wax the developement of a country. All the developed countries of the world have better working and living conditions
- Professors are normally found in university classrooms, offices, and libraries doing research and lecturing to their students. More and more, however, they also appear as guests on television news programs, giving expert commentary on the latest events in 85
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and su 33
- he effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your pos 33
- Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study in which jobs are plentiful.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and 56
- People today spent too much time on personal enjoyement-doing things they like to do- rather than doing things they should do. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ne are those, under whom leadership, the condition of citizens had become better....
^^
Line 4, column 19, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'citizens'' or 'citizen's'?
Suggestion: citizens'; citizen's
...plifting common man. Moreover, healthy citizens means better workfore, less diseases, l...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 51, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun diseases is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...healthy citizens means better workfore, less diseases, less economic gap which will ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, look, moreover, well, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 33.0505617978 15% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 58.6224719101 41% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1013.0 2235.4752809 45% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 196.0 442.535393258 44% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16836734694 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 4.55969084622 82% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71360951374 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 215.323595506 54% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591836734694 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 704.065955056 46% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.7450471608 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.3 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.21951772744 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141334777944 0.243740707755 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580165551714 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539679503064 0.0758088955206 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0910037231758 0.150359130593 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381888699714 0.0667264976115 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 100.480337079 57% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.