This material addresses the issue of the authenticity of the portrait related to the famous writer Jane Austen. The reading passage suggests that the portrait is a professional work with the image of Austen. The lecturer, on the other hand, refutes this information by stating that there is not enough evidence for the mentioned conclusion.
To begin with, the reading passage highlights that Austen's family recognized the authenticity of the portrait over a century ago when they sanctioned its use as an illustration to a Austen's book. However, the professor casts doubt on this and argues that by the time of the book's publication Austen had been dead for about seventy years and, therefore, her relatives could not have seen the famous writer to be able to recognize her picture.
Additionally, the article posits that the image on the portrait resembles the face of adult Austen depicted on the sketch drawn by her sister. Meanwhile, the professor advocates a different approach and provides the following details. Namely, he mentions that the person on the portrait could have been one of Austen's teenage relatives.
Finally, the author invites attention to the fact that the style of the portrait may be linked to a professional painter who chronologically and due to some other considerations could have been the creator of the picture at the time when Austin was a teenager. This goes counter to the listening passage, according to which, the stamp on the canvas connects it to a person who started to sell canvases only after Austin had become 27.
- This material addresses the question of whether genetically modified trees have more benefits as compared to natural ones. The reading passage suggests that there are some serious advantages to be considered. The lecturer, on the other hand, refutes this 78
- This material addresses the question of whether ethanol fuel is a good alternative to gasoline in the Northern America. The reading passage suggests that the disadvantages of ethanol fuel outweigh its advantages. The lecturer, on the other hand, refutes t 78
- It is more important to keep your old friends than to make new friends. 60
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. 70
- TPO 34Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on the cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.Use specific reasons and 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 342, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... evidence for the mentioned conclusion. To begin with, the reading passage highl...
^^^
Line 2, column 181, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...anctioned its use as an illustration to a Austens book. However, the professor ca...
^
Line 2, column 275, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'books'' or 'book's'?
Suggestion: books'; book's
...this and argues that by the time of the books publication Austen had been dead for ab...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1302.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 259.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02702702703 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78924862151 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559845559846 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.5597984969 49.2860985944 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.2 110.228320801 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9 21.698381199 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.7 7.06452816374 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126099113742 0.272083759551 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0506856231183 0.0996497079465 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0357159146444 0.0662205650399 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0775951649171 0.162205337803 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350333395476 0.0443174109184 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.3589403974 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.