Young people in the modern world seem to have more power and influence than any previous young generation. Why is this the case? What impact does this have on the relationship between old and young people?
These days, it has become a growing trend to see young people have more power and influences compare to their older counterparts. As such, it has both merits and demerits, although I am opinion that the former outdo latter. I lay down reasons to support my viewpoint with relevant examples.
There are myriads of argument in favour of my stance. The most conspicuous one is that young people get power and influence because of the modern technologies and social media such facebook, twitter and many more and young people are the structure that holds a country. People not only realised the positive impact of young people having power and influence such as they can actively give their opinion about different issue as we recently saw in Hongkong where youth protested against government. All these upsides stand country and its citizens in good stead has far as youth having more power and influence is concerned.
There, however, are some pitfalls which overwhelm the potential benefits of young people having power and influence. The primary one lies in the fact that it has negative impact on the relationship between old and young people as they grow apart. Another overt aspect of this argument is that it causes a communication blockade between young and old, which hampers their relationship. Hence, it is apparent from aforementioned discussion why people are concerned about youth having more power and influence in the modern world.
In view of argument outlined above, one can conclude that despite some drawbacks, benefits of young ones with power and influence is too great indeed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-09 | nevermind123 | 77 | view |
- Protection of wild animals is a waste of resources Wild animals have no place in the 21st century and trying to preserve these animals is wastage of resources To what extent do you agree or disagree 88
- Companies should encourage old employees to retire. The elderly people of over 50 years of age should be retired and be replaced by young. Do you agree or disagree? 87
- Some people think technology helps us save time but others believe wastes our time. 72
- Many students take part-time jobs while studying in university. Do you think it is a good idea or a bad idea? 55
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Dancing plays an important role in a culture Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 235, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that the former outdo latter. I lay down reasons to support my viewpoint with rel...
^^
Line 3, column 295, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...olds a country. People not only realised the positive impact of young people havi...
^^
Line 5, column 482, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... people are concerned about youth having more power and influence in the modern w...
^^
Line 7, column 130, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s of young ones with power and influence is too great indeed.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1343.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10646387833 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57734102376 2.71678728327 95% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566539923954 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.093165399 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.916666667 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.58333333333 7.25397266985 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.462179359166 0.242375264174 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15852682432 0.0925447433944 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10542451617 0.071462118173 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264157494257 0.151781067708 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144011785012 0.0609392437508 236% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.