The bar graph illustrates the proportion of the citizens of four nations( India, China, USA, Japan) comparing with all people entire the world in the year 1950/2002 and prediction in 2050.
Overall, it is immediately clear that the rate of population in China accounted for the highest in two years( 1950 and 2002) but the 50 years of 20 century is potential that in India peaks up sharply and exceeds in China to lead.
In 1950, China had the most crowded population in the world, standing at 22% and followed by the USA with 17 %. Meanwhile, the min percentage of the total of global people belonged to Japan( about 3%). There were downward trends in the proportion of citizens of China, USA and Japan, decreasing significantly. In particular, only 20% of the total was the percentage of Chinese in 2002, and this figure continued to anticipate that going down in 2050 with 15%. In addition, the population of the USA and Japan witnessed similar patents, their nadirs were 5% and 1,5% respectively.
On the other hand, in 2002 the proportion of India took up the second rank in four countries at 15%. There was a climb in this figure, picked up dramatically over 7 years( 17%) and the projections for 2050, it becomes the top of the level, touching its milestone at approximately 19%.
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s. 78
- The table below shows the worldwide market share of mobile phone market for manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006 51
- The pie charts below show information on the highest level of education of women in Someland in 1945 and 1995. 61
- Many foods are shipped from far away. Some people think that eating local food is more environmentally and economically. Do you think the advantages outweigh its disadvantages. 73
- Some people think that it is better to educate boys and girls in separate schools. Others, however, believe that boys and girls benefit more from attending mixed schools.Discuss both these views and five your own opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 147, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'century' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'centuries'.
Suggestion: centuries
...rs 1950 and 2002 but the 50 years of 20 century is potential that in India peaks up sha...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 283, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing its milestone at approximately 19%.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, while, in addition, in particular, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1057.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71875 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72246801611 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575892857143 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9957473985 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.444444444 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8888888889 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291547153022 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106303175649 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566169914954 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162932103147 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355669278826 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.