People are living in a ‘throwaway society’, using things for a short time and then throwing them away. What are the causes of this? What problems does it lead to?
Living in a modern society, people tend to more and more enjoy one-time-used products and disposed of these products right after using. This tendency appeared because of several reasons which are explained below. Additionally, the consequences of this issue will be named after the reasons.
The throwaway trend might start from the new modern life-style and convenience of using short-time products. We cannot deny the fact that the world is developing at a remarkable speed changing the living style of most civilians, especially urban residents, who have little time for household chores. As a result, temporary goods show up as the problem-solver, people can spend less time washing dishes or laundering and instead, having more time for their family which takes up a little proportion in their time budget nowadays. Another reason behind the increasing fascination for one-time-used merchandises is that they just incredibly convenient comparing with other traditional goods. People can purchase these kinds of goods from hypermarket to the center shops with reasonable and affordable prices. Moreover, consumers can change the styles and brands of the product easily whenever they enjoy without costing lots of money like the permanent products.
Despite of all the beneficial perspectives, the throwaway trend definitely brings out more negative consequences which are environment issues and the appreciation with products. First and foremost, if we keep disposing of the short-time products daily, the environment will have to suffer from tons of rubbish per day. For instance, people usually use plastic bags for shopping purpose and throwing these bags immediately after finnish using them. As many scientists have proved, these kinds of bags need at least a millennium to decompose. As a result, environment pollution is unavoidable if we keep continue throwing things away. Furthermore, using temporary products for long time will lead to the lacking of appreciation with stuffs. As people using things for just one time, they do not feel their responsibility to protect and treasure their objects.
In conclude, I think that the formation of throwaway society is the result of new life-style. As we let this problem continue, it will lead to detrimental issue like environment pollution. So I highly recommend that people should reduce using the temporary products.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-12 | minhanh2410 | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-19 | tien.xinh.ne | 67 | view |
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 73
- Task 1: The information below gives details about household income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in one UK city in 2010 and 2013. 73
- The pictures describe the cutting tools created by our ancestors at two different ages 56
- Many university students live with their families, while other live away from home because their universities are in different places. What are the advantages and disadvantages of both situations? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 268, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ld reduce using the temporary products.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, at least, for instance, i think, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2022.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49456521739 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93743841185 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567934782609 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9447299921 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.421052632 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3684210526 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.31578947368 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242872688232 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.073269129475 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454639518821 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147771827642 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0380846140815 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.