The provided table offers an overview about the percentage of students who gave good ratings for a multitude of aspects of a university over three seperate years.
As is observed, all aspects listed on the table underwent a decade of constant increase in good ratings with the exception of range of modules offered and buildings and teaching facilities. Besides, print resources were cited as the aspect with the highest good ratings according to the surveys.
Closer investigation reveals that print resources topped the chart with the highest good ratings among given categories over the surveyed period, reaching a peak of 89% in 2005, although the most noticeable increase was witnessed in electronic resources, accounting for a 43% gain compared to its initial figure in 2000. With regards to the remaining aspects, whilst range of modules offered reported a slight drop of 5%, buildings and teaching facilities remained completely unchanged over the surveyed period.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of unemployed graduates, aged 20-24, in one European country over a two-year period. 78
- The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 ad 2010 about one university.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...de of constant increase in good ratings with the exception of range of modules offered and buildings ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 826.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39869281046 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74235779819 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.627450980392 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.5107084066 43.030603864 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.2 112.824112599 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.2 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.068601066778 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0359396692092 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0207444524166 0.0843802449381 25% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0462183770508 0.15604864568 30% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0217888969023 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 13.2329268293 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 61.2550243902 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.7 8.06136585366 133% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.