"In a war of ideas, it is people who get killed". Does a common man suffer from a group's ideology? Express your opinion, and support the same with reasons and examples.
Recently, the phenomenon of the group's ideology has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “is it advantageous or not?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that idea's war is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the political standpoint, idea's war is bound up inextricably with groups, which indicates they lead to both positive attitudes and ideologic people. As a well–known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between group conformity and killing people as well as an exponential increase in suffering people. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of government views is correlated positively with not only common ideas but also people ideologists.
Within the realm the general science, without the slightest doubt, people ideologists attribute to common ideas, in that it would come down to being suffered, getting killed and traditional ideas. A salient example of such attribution is group views, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take negative ideas for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint the economic problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of the group's ideology.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above. I firmly believe that the advantages of a group's ideology are of more significance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-14 | bita_harzandi@yahoo.com | 77 | view |
| 2019-07-14 | bita_harzandi@yahoo.com | 77 | view |
- Internet or media is bad for young people because they make the young generation poor in communication and forming relationships. Do you agree with this opinion? Please use examples or your personal experience to support your idea. 88
- "In a war of ideas, it is people who get killed". Does a common man suffer from a group's ideology? Express your opinion, and support the same with reasons and examples. 77
- Do you think consumer should avoid over packaged products or it is the manufacturer that should avoid extra packaging of products? Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience. 85
- Whether a nation should host international events like Olympic Games and World Cup? 85
- Information revolution has changed the way of mass communications and had some bad and good effects on individual lives as well as on society. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 33, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'groups'' or 'group's'?
Suggestion: groups'; group's
Recently, the phenomenon of the groups ideology has sparked an ongoing controv...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 512, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'groups'' or 'group's'?
Suggestion: groups'; group's
...onable to infer the pivotal role of the groups ideology. To conclude, as for myself, ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 84, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...oes 'all's well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above....
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 172, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'groups'' or 'group's'?
Suggestion: groups'; group's
...firmly believe that the advantages of a groups ideology are of more significance.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1376.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 248.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54838709677 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16982677271 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.685483870968 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1329696289 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.090909091 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5454545455 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.18181818182 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18118336842 0.242375264174 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0614366625567 0.0925447433944 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431576730666 0.071462118173 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0917439725869 0.151781067708 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496640740814 0.0609392437508 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.39 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.94827586207 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.