The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in japan and malaysia in this year.
The graphs underneath, indicate the comparation of average household expenditures by Major category in japan and malaysia. The miscellaneous of expense like housing, transport, food, health care and other goods and services.
The top category is housing has a percentage of 21% in japan, meanwhile malaysia has the strenght of 34% with difference for 13%. In japan, transportation has the highest percentage of 29% than malaysia which was 26% with little deviation for 3%. At the same time food category has considerable percentage of 24% in japan and 27% in malaysia the greater one, it has similar quarrel with transportation denomination. The health care of these countries has the smallest grade of 6% in japan and 3% in malaysia, which has the difference of 3%. Lastly, category there other goods and services, japan has the value of 20% and 10% in malaysia, the difference is also quite large, which is 10%.
The inference of household expenditures in japan and malaysia for average has the confronment and can be conclude that; the highest of the outlay of household in japan is transportation and malaysia has the housing. Hereinafter, there food category with high percentage from both of these country. housing category are third place in japan, whereas malaysia accopied for transportation. Next, other goods and services has ranked fourth in japan, so is malaysia. At last, there health care, both of them has same category with the lowest allocation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-15 | fadhiahelbas | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-15 | fadhiahelbas | 61 | view |
- The tables below give information about sales of fairtrade labeled coffe and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European Countries. Summarise the information by selectimg and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The Bar Chart shows CO2 emissions for different form of transport in the European Union. The pie chart shows the percentage of European Union funds being spent on different forms of transport. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples 84
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- the chart below shows the GDP growt per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010. 61
- Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society. To what extent do you agree? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 2, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... care and other goods and services. The top category is housing has a percentag...
^^^
Line 5, column 299, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Housing
... percentage from both of these country. housing category are third place in japan, wher...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, lastly, so, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1234.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18487394958 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9797233933 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470588235294 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 376.2 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0423559171 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.833333333 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8333333333 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.58333333333 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235803317666 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106791791638 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100309640229 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191769046431 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373034373634 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.