The graph shows the total lenght of telephone calls in UK. It was devided into three categories are local-fixed line, national, and interpersonal-fixed line that influence alteration from in 1995 to 2002. Overall, as can be seem that the number of in 1995 until 2002 is maitais the same level.
Recording to the data, in 1995 of local-fixed went up until 1999 but in 2000 it was seen decline slowly so that back to the same level.
Unlike with case above, national and interpersonal-fixed line increase from 1995 to 2002 from year to year for seven years. It was changed from 34 to 62. Therefore surge about 25 and mobiles were seen extremely clear that experience a drastic grow from 1995 only 4 and in 2002 soar about 45 as the end of development mobile.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-17 | milabahtiar | 22 | view |
- The maps below show diverification of island. The first island had not constraction of facility for visitor while the second island had complete fasilities built some fasilities which profitable. 56
- The maps below show diverification of island. The first island had not constraction of facility for visitor while the second island had complete fasilities built some fasilities which profitable. 56
- the graph gives information about consumption of energy in the USA for 10 years from 1980 until 2030. overall, petrol and oil increase from 35 to 50. while coal experience changed a rather up from 16 to 29. weals nuclear solar/ wind hydropower is maintain 22
- The graph shows the total lenght of telephone calls in UK. It was devided into three categories are local-fixed line, national, and interpersonal-fixed line that influence alteration from in 1995 to 2002. Overall, as can be seem that the number of in 1995 22
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 154, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...en years. It was changed from 34 to 62. Therefore surge about 25 and mobiles were seen ex...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 24.0651302605 17% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 41.998997996 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 378.0 1615.20841683 23% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 85.0 315.596192385 27% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.44705882353 5.12529762239 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.03637027671 4.20363070211 72% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71109472392 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 62.0 176.041082164 35% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.729411764706 0.561755894193 130% => OK
syllable_count: 112.5 506.74238477 22% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.60771543086 81% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 16.0721442886 25% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1602099306 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.38176352705 46% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247671789848 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130438731908 0.084324248473 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598734709803 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174870895751 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387281077887 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 50.2224549098 150% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.3001002004 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.53 12.4159519038 69% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 18.0 78.4519038076 23% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 22.4719101124 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.