Some people take the view that older children can take care of younger children, some others may hold the view that taking care of children should be done by other adults.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 280, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... not know what they do in a circumstance , so it dramatically reduce their develop...
^^
Line 5, column 302, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reduces'?
Suggestion: reduces
... in a circumstance , so it dramatically reduce their developments in the future. Howev...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 700, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...en to sharpen critical thinking skills. the knowledge, which gained from knowing wh...
^^^
Line 5, column 886, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
... results and consequences and to decide whether or not they should do it. Hence, this allows t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 998, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'problem'?
Suggestion: problem
...own ways of thinking about a particular problems. Therefore, their critical thinking ski...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, as to, in conclusion, in fact, in general, in summary, by and large, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2299.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 477.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81970649895 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68419173004 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492662473795 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 718.2 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.2610103481 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.1481481481 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.51851851852 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295674998059 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857566295037 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112932213217 0.0737576698707 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253033474973 0.150856017488 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14019136701 0.0645574589148 217% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.