Discuss whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people life or work
Surely there has no time in history where the lives of people have changed more dramatically. A quick reflection on typical day reveals design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people life and work has been one of the prominent topics in the contemporary discussion. In my point of view architecture of building will have positive impact on individual life and I will discuss reasons regarding this argument in upcoming paragraphs.
To commence with, there are enormous good impact on people life and work by design of building. Firstly, good infrastructure of building get motivates them to work harder with full dedication because who one is design the model of building with own better efforts to create a beautiful structure of building so people get inspire. Moreover, good structure of building provides better facilities such as proper ventilation system and other more system.
In addition, the architectural design of building provide better structure of proper house in past time building had covered huge area of earth and it was very large but in modern building covered small area and provide beautiful look. Furthermore, good infrastructure of building provides better privacy concern.
To conclusion, design of building would have positive impact on people life and work in which masses give motivates and admire
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-07-18 | English time | 77 | view |
- Advantages and disadvantages of living in an era in which new things are constantly being invented? 62
- Air travel can only benefit the richest people in the world. Ordinary people can get to advantages with the development of air travel. 77
- Advantages and disadvantages of living in an era in which new things are constantly being invented? 55
- Fresh water resources diminish in large cities in the world each year. 77
- What do you think is it government s duty to support financially to its natives and to provide nourishment after they console from the jobs what is your opinion 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 200, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a one'.
Suggestion: who is a one
...ork harder with full dedication because who one is design the model of building with ow...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 95, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...ide better structure of proper house in past time building had covered huge area of earth...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sitive impact on people life and work in which masses give motivates and admire ...
^^
Line 4, column 117, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and work in which masses give motivates and admire
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, moreover, regarding, so, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.5418719212 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 20.9802955665 24% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1138.0 1207.87684729 94% => OK
No of words: 216.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26851851852 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82713859229 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 139.433497537 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546296296296 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 366.3 379.143842365 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.6157635468 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0570431484 50.4703680194 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.444444444 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.88888888889 7.25397266985 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.50314335017 0.242375264174 208% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.222820934133 0.0925447433944 241% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15761343689 0.071462118173 221% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.328014036895 0.151781067708 216% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.17089105515 0.0609392437508 280% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 55.0591133005 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.