A tendency that the news reported in the media focuses on problems and emergencies rather than the positive developments is harmful to both the individual and the society. To what extent, do you agree or disagree with this statement
Today, we live in a competitive era, various sources of media are focusing on sensation news, which fetch more viewers and readers. Some argues that this attitude is harmful for the people and the society. However, I disagree with this, as I believe that as long as the negative news reports are unbiased, the general public will not be harmed and there will be no detrimental effects on individuals and society.
My first argument is that it is the duty of the media to keep people abreast of what is happening. If bad things are happening, the citizens should be known so as they can protect themselves. Secondly, more news like that being spread, more volunteers would join in to protect the society. For instance, two years ago when Japanese suffered loss from disaster, news was spread like wildfire through all sources of media that a huge number of people sent relief in whatever way they could.
Undoubtedly, it is the onus of the media to report positive developments also. The media is a link between the government and the people. Very few people get to meet any politician in real life, but we can reach our voices to the authorities through the press. Then, the media also helps to get justice at times. In the Le Dieu Linh rape case in September 2018, it was through the efforts of the media that the culprits got a deserved punishment and her family got rights.
To sum up, it is imperative that media reports both positive and negative news without any bias and exaggeration. It its humans’ responsibilities to take the news with caution and analyze it with their critical thinking skills. Therefore, reporting more news on problems and emergencies is definitely not bad.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-10 | vishal sachdeva | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-22 | Narges.s | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-22 | Narges.s | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-22 | my050901 | 73 | view |
| 2018-12-10 | vishal sachdeva | 77 | view |
- Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitor for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent, do you agree or disagree 73
- Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitor for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent, do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people think that the most important thing about being rich is that it gives an opportunity to help other people. To what extent, do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people think that the most important thing about being rich is that it gives an opportunity to help other people. To what extent, do you agree or disagree 89
- For schoolchildren, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents. To what extent, do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 311, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...negative news reports are unbiased, the general public will not be harmed and there will be no...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 74, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...e media to report positive developments also. The media is a link between the govern...
^^^^
Line 5, column 90, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[4]
Message: You should probably use: 'are'.
Suggestion: are
...t positive developments also. The media is a link between the government and the p...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8156996587 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65554891392 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597269624573 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7461978521 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0666666667 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274405920558 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0868960748154 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656143593973 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158602057891 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760387877308 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.