The maps below show recent changes in the town of Kimsville.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two maps illustrate the main changes which have tack place in the town of Kimaville between 2002 and today.
In general, it appears that Kimaville has become a little more modern city with a pub, a stadium and new train station.
In 2002, in the north-west and south-west of the Kimsville used to be two green wood with lots of trees, but the trees has been cut down, and a new apartment in the north-west and a football stadium in the south-west has been constructed. The next interesting development has been built a new train station in the west of city center.
If we look at the south of city center, we can see the old cinema has been changed to the pub. Another striking change is that there was a factory in the east of the city center although it destroyed and the new software company has been built next to the city center.
- Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in theprotection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree about this opinion? 67
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant. 85
- Some people tend to believe that the wild animals and birds need extra attention and people should protect them 56
- These days it is very common to have people from two different generations mix in the same workplace.Are there more advantages or disadvantages to this situation? Give your own opinion and include relevant examples. 56
- Due the advancement in computer technology the trend of working from home will bring a dramatic change to people’s lives. Is it a positive or negative development?Give your opinion and examples. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 688.0 965.302439024 71% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.41025641026 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41243763822 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551282051282 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 200.7 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7998283995 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.666666667 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0536831569049 0.215688989381 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0348605108292 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534280233431 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0466529072536 0.15604864568 30% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618118578649 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.59 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.