Some people think that younger employees often have more skills, knowledge and motivation than the old empolyees. To what extent do you agree? Use your opinion.
In this ever advancing era, development can be seen happening comically. However, there are debatable side of many of these advancements has now become controversial. Likewise, some masses reckon that younger employees often have more skill, knowledge and motivation than old employees, while others contradict their claim. The following exposition will further bolster my views in this regard.
To initiate with, there are numerous aspects favoring the proposition, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that younger generations are more energetic and educated as they have just graduated from accredited universities recently. They also are more familiar with the latest technology and are always updated themselves than older people. Besides, there is no fallacy is arguing that younger workers are more likely to improve the companies rather than older workers.
Probing ahead, it would be justifiable to assert that younger workers are more flexible and adjustable when it comes to change departments or positions. Another substantial equivalent in addition to this is that they can adapt more easily to the changing environment and be able to learn and understand new skills than older workers. When younger worker attend companies courses or workshops, they can easily to understand and apply in a productive way which it could not find in older colleagues.
To sum up, since strong and validating points are there in favor of the proposition so I would clinch by saying that young employees are pillars and strength of the companies because they have myriad of knowledge.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-25 | vj rajpoot | 85 | view |
- Government should spend money on health or education 90
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. Is it good or bad? 77
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace, so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? support your opinion with examples. 77
- Will computer be able to replace classroom teacher? 77
- Should parents be legally held responsible for their child's behavior? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 433, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a productive way" with adverb for "productive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...they can easily to understand and apply in a productive way which it could not find in older collea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, likewise, so, while, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1344.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 250.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.376 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79644345553 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3500834578 50.4703680194 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.181818182 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7272727273 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 7.25397266985 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18146208443 0.242375264174 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655078326763 0.0925447433944 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0845390584352 0.071462118173 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101940025471 0.151781067708 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050789806319 0.0609392437508 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 12.6369458128 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.