Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life. Discuss
Recently, the phenomenon of spending the time and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of having free time is highly beneficial such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantials number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that a casual work can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, working conditions can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of time management, as well as private life, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered a personal life. thus, beneficial ramifications of both a healthy life and the role of time apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, wasting time might increase the consequences of a peaceful life. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of timetables could relate to this reality that the demerits of time working pertain to daily life. as a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted the downside of the full-time work is correlated negatively with a different life. hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of part-time work.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I extremely believe that the benefits of restricting working time far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the role of time prove the significance of work-life balance, but also pinpoint the paid work implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-05 | yasamin.gharib62 | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | gupta-vikas | 55 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | richierich25 | 85 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | priyankavs23 | 77 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | priyankavs23 | 77 | view |
- People succeed because of their hard work; luck has nothing to do with success. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 77
- If you want to study a particular area of climate change, which area/subject will you choose? 11
- Governments promise continuous economic growth, but it is actually illusion. Some people think that governments should abandon this. Give your opinion. 85
- The university will deduct the students' score for late assignments. Opinion and solutions? 85
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 22
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 350, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...iment which discovered a personal life. thus, beneficial ramifications of both a hea...
^^^^
Line 5, column 229, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: As
... of time working pertain to daily life. as a tangible example, some scientific res...
^^
Line 5, column 412, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Hence
...lated negatively with a different life. hence, it is correct to presume the preconcei...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1394.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 262.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32061068702 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11936456499 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62213740458 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0069438704 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.166666667 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286735189312 0.242375264174 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10689971826 0.0925447433944 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0344130414147 0.071462118173 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170828757731 0.151781067708 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346152275779 0.0609392437508 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 12.6369458128 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 55.0591133005 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.