It is quite common for both parents in a family to work. Sometimes this is because they need two salaries to survive whereas other times it is their choice.
What are the problems you see in this situation? How does this affect the children and the family life?
Throughout the history of mankind, it is true that most civilizations around the world started having the families which contained the work of both parents for lots of reasons with regard to the needed salaries to deal with the pace of life nowadays or it was just their personal reasons for choosing it. In my opinion, while I agree that it would take more moneys and benefits for family's budget if both parents in a house go to work, but I still believe that it also get some negative effects into their children and the life of family.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why it is quite common for both father and mother in a family to become a worker. The first reason to support it is that many capitals on Earth are increasing the economic, which get more opportunity for the poor and average families to get more works for the reason of taking enough money to survive. To illustrate, we can see from thousands of family in Hanoi at present, a city which have contained lots of family's worker in both sides of sex, are enduring the increase of product's price such as foods, drinks or clothes. Therefore, every family must have two workers to deal with these problems and spend more money for the survival of their son and home. Moreover, it also has some people who especially love working and want to make their personal childhood's dream become the true.
On the other hand, I believe that despite of all this positive effect, it also gets the negative things into their children when they were alone in home and did not get the love and the care of family. it stands to the reason that the children in this family would lose the emotion based on the love of father as well as mother and it would potentially make them to become a bad child. One particularly salient example for this is the article having been published by The New York Time Magazine indicating that people who did not have the care of their parents when they were a child are more potential to acknowledge the bad things of social life and 50% of them commit a crime.
In a nutshell, it seems to me that although the mission of parents to spend money for family is greatly important, the care for their son and daughter could also value considerably.
- Fashion is difficult to follow and some people argue that we should not follow it They think that we should dress what we like and feel comfortable Do you agree or disagree 89
- Do you think a museum is to educate or entertain people? 84
- Some people feel that certain workers like nurses, doctors and teachers are undervalued and should be paid more, especially when other people like film actors or company bosses are paid huge sums of money that are out of proportion to the importance of th 73
- Fashion is difficult to follow, and some people argue that we should not follow it. They think that we should dress what we like and feel comfortable. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- The government should control the amount of violence in films and on television in order to control violent crimes in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this action? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 203, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ot get the love and the care of family. it stands to the reason that the children ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, while, such as, as well as, in my opinion, it is true, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1839.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 407.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51842751843 5.12529762239 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30566346394 2.80592935109 82% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493857493857 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 589.5 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 20.2975951904 182% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.3647691762 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.181818182 106.682146367 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.0 20.7667163134 178% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.4545454545 7.06120827912 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293624472828 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114526016428 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0312699400133 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169640980055 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324470325818 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 50.2224549098 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.53 12.4159519038 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 26.0 9.78957915832 266% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.1190380762 166% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.