Scientific research and development is our gateway to the future. Government should be concerned with what is being researched on and developed in their respective countries. A research can lead to both good and bad results and hence I think that government should place restrictions for the following two reasons.
First, the influence of human touch is extremely dangerous in any field. Humans can be greedy and that results to sever consequences. For example, a famous incident where Lance Armstrong – a cyclist – was caught doping. This example connects in a way that shows humans go to any lengths to reach their goal. Industries will try to research into dangerous weapons and might even produce something which is more dangerous than the nuclear bomb! Or, experiments of humans might begin which has several strict restrictions as of now. Even though, it would help us learn more about humans, but at what cost?
Moreover, there are restrictions already in place. These restrictions work just fine as we our everyday world getting revolutionized at a break taking rate that we are inured to the process. For example, button phones are obsolete and almost every phone has a touch screen. The upcoming breakthrough is the bending phone where one can literally bend the phone! It’s still in early development stages and still lacking. These all have been built with the government restrictions. One can even appeal to the government if certain restrictions are truly a hindrance. The restrictions are here to protect us from ourselves.
Although, there are a few advantages of doing away with the restrictions. “Only those who risk going too far can possibly find out how far one can go.” – TS Elliot. We could have faster but unmoderated development. There would be more people willing to invest in this sector.
To conclude, this issue is actually very complex and there are no simple answers. I feel moderation is always good but some people break the already present restrictions. I mostly agree that restrictions should be present for the above mentioned reasons. But some countries, might choose to forgo them in temptation of faster progress.
- Students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing a 50
- 49. Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or dis 58
- Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin, a medicine used to treat headaches. Although many foods are naturally rich in salicylates, for the past several decades food-processing companies have also been adding salicylates to foods as 55
- Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development. 54
- In order for any work of art—for example, a film, a novel, a poem, or a song—to have merit, it must be understandable to most people.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your re 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 625, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... are here to protect us from ourselves. Although, there are a few advantages of doing aw...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 114, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'can'.
Suggestion: can
...'Only those who risk going too far can possibly find out how far one can go.' – TS...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, hence, if, moreover, so, still, for example, i feel, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1825.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 356.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12640449438 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82920115614 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587078651685 0.4932671777 119% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2306368927 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.0416666667 118.986275619 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8333333333 23.4991977007 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.41666666667 5.21951772744 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231001330203 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587330136508 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074305955391 0.0758088955206 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120215343059 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10953730673 0.0667264976115 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 48.8420337079 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 12.1743820225 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.88 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.