The charts below show the main methods of transportation for people travelling to one university for work or study in 2004 and 2009.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate the use of vehicles to go to one university for different purposes in 2004 and 2009.
It is clear that the amount of people went to the university by car at 2004 took up more than a half of the proportion while in 2009, it was the bus that dominated the chart.
In the year of 2004, the percentage of car was 51%. But due to a change in car parking at 2008, this number fell dramatically, only remained nearly one-third of the margin at 2009. Also, with the establishment of a new bus stop at 2006, the domination of bus at 2009 was a clear thing, with nearly 50% captured.
On the other hand, the remaining means of transport had some optimistic changes. Both train and walking saw a slight increase of 1% and 2%, respectively. In addition, the amount of cyclists got a 7% leap, and that was almost double compared with the year of 2004.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-04 | nguyenphthao99@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | Szprawstyle | 82 | view |
- The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Students should be taught academic knowledge so that they can pass exams, and skills such as cooking or dressing should not be taught. To what extent do you agree/disagree? 84
- The pie charts and table give information about the total value and sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The pictures below show how tomato ketchup is made.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features. 11
- The flowchart below shows the process of making recycled bottles.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, third, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 712.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.3950617284 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59547165244 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604938271605 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 203.4 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3343845414 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139854925199 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621944548218 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067869872539 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105006202542 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0736166094284 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.24 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.16 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.