Many people assume that the goal of every country should be to produce more materials and goods.To what extent do you agree or disagree that constantly increasing production is an appropriate goal?Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant exa

Right from the stone age, people need food, shelter and clothes to accomplish their basic amenities of life. In the today's materialistic world, everyone is running behind the consumeristic goods and materials. However, the companies in countries are playing an imperative role in providing goods and materials to masses with an increasing speed. I am partially agree with the notion and reasons behind these are dispensed below.

To embark with, constantly production of goods and materials in the companies will provide a source of employment for the people. For production, factories require more and more workers. Hence, the companies will make people employable. Moreover, the business of companies will flourishes by leaps and bound. For instance, the products manufactured in the countries are shipped to another regions. The country do not only get good money but also the popularity of the particular product will be increased by importing the same.

On the other side, production of many products have various impacts like the waste materials from the companies, sometimes are not managed properly and it causes myriad problems like pollution. Apart form this, the companies and factories require more land and an area which is away from vicinity. It can be quite handy to approach these things. The production of materials and goods need appropriate resources to manufacture them. Hence, it would not be easy at the beginning.

Suffice to say, we can say that increasing production will help the country and people in various ways but it has many negative effects also. The country should focus on other national insecurities like poverty and unemployment rather than producing materials. The production of these things should be up to some extent so that other problems should also be taken under consideration.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 362, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...ith an increasing speed. I am partially agree with the notion and reasons behind thes...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'flourish'
Suggestion: flourish
...oreover, the business of companies will flourishes by leaps and bound. For instance, the p...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 195, Rule ID: APART_FORM[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'apart from'?
Suggestion: Apart from
... causes myriad problems like pollution. Apart form this, the companies and factories requi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 137, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...s ways but it has many negative effects also. The country should focus on other nati...
^^^^
Line 7, column 386, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ould also be taken under consideration.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, for instance

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1548.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33793103448 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80881066651 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572413793103 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.0553527975 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1111111111 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.16666666667 7.06120827912 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245450595283 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0705090590835 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412167565195 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141734556222 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305374226318 0.056905535591 54% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.