Teachers are the builder of a nation. When a child left home for school, it is teachers who take care of them and teach academic lessons including social and moral values. If a teacher influence students thought, it will not help to develop his/her proper values. So, I agree with the statement that teachers should not make their social or political views known to a student in the classroom.
First of all, the main duty of a teacher to teach a student. It is important to teach in a good manner because it will help them to build their further career. So, to keep a student's future life net and cline, a teacher might teach some social values or culture and this really helps to build his career. For instance, in Bangladesh, student politics are not allowed until college. So, till the senior high school, teachers or others can not influence them. In Bangladesh, it is a rule that teachers and government officers might hold a political opinion but they can not express it in public because the government thinks that it will influence others. So, the teacher should focus more on teaching instead of expressing their political and social views on classroom or public.
Secondly, children who are studying in primary or junior high school, they literally think their teacher as their idle and hero. They listen to what he/she says, try to do what teachers are doing and follow like a hero. So, if a teacher makes their social or political views known to students in the classroom, this will limit the scope of thinking of a student. For instance, In China or North Korea students have to learn about their leaders in the early life of study. Even in North Korea, they have to pray for their leader before stating their school life. I this way, they heavily influence these children thought and manipulate them through teachers.
In conclusion, a good teacher should teach in a manner that will help to develop a strong personality of a student. He must teach about life and values on society. By this way, they would be able to create their own social and political views.
- integrated task: salvage logging benefits 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign country. 70
- "The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition." - Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or dis 50
- People attend college or university for many different reasons (for example, new experiences, career preparation, increased knowledge). Why do you think people attend college or university? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TOEFL integrated writing Chevalier de Seingalt 52
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, really, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1724.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 365.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72328767123 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38532449376 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471232876712 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 506.7 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4031248659 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.35 5.45110844103 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405866701955 0.236089414692 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141884815138 0.076458572812 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155807184783 0.0737576698707 211% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.28034392645 0.150856017488 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0813650677894 0.0645574589148 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.