The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors who satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.
The tables give data about how many people visit to Ashdown Museum in 2 periods: before and after it is redecorated. The charts illustrate different categories of visitor’s satisfaction during the same time.
Overall, the table indicate the number of visitors coming to museum is much higher after its refurbishment. The charts show that the level of satisfaction of visitor increase sharply in the year after the museum is redecorated.
The renew of Ashdown Museum attract many people coming to, with rising from 74.000 visitors to 92.000 visitors.
With regarding two charts, before the museum is modernized, the result is quite negative. Only 15% of visitors very satisfied about this place, whereas those who are dissatisfied accounted for 40%. After its refurbishment, the number of dissatisfied people decline sharply, just at 15%. In contrast, there was a dramatic increase in very satisfied visitors, rising to 35%. The percentage of people who do not response remain at the same figure 5% during 2 periods.
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the UK, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007( you can search google for seeing the picture) 73
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world. 78
- The diagram below show how orange juice is produced 56
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors who satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods. 78
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The tables give data about how many peop...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s satisfaction during the same time. Overall, the table indicate the number o...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... year after the museum is redecorated. The renew of Ashdown Museum attract many people c...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 74.000 visitors to 92.000 visitors. With regarding two charts, before the mu...
^^^^
Line 6, column 470, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at the same figure 5% during 2 periods.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 867.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31901840491 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89508155906 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60736196319 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 11.9398492453 43.030603864 28% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.7 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.40095538444 0.215688989381 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141736234042 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663792338528 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224773739217 0.15604864568 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0767395639435 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.