When a country develops its technology the Traditional skills and ways of life die out.It is pointless to try and keep them alive .To what extent do you agree or disagree. Use your own ideas and exaples .
In the burgeoning era of technological advancement it is debetable issue that when a nation ameliorates its technology the tradional skills and culture disapper. The ordous efforts to make them flourishing is baseless. However, I concur with the statement to some extent and i belive this matter should be discussed in the light of several factors before a resonable conclusion can be drawn.
As far as my views are concerned the addiction of gadgets in society widen the gap amongst the proponents that vanishes the tradtion of gregariousness. Besides this, some innovations like weapons of mass distruction, nuclear power are having a deyrimental impact. The another impact of developing technology globally is domination of western culture eventually mitigating the occidental customs. To cite an example, the inclination of people towards western clothing ,food, creative skills ,lead to vanish their own customs and skills.
On the contrary, I reackon that owing to the geaographical independence folks can travel accross the world that gives them the opportunity to see them their ancient skills and ways of life. Morover, medical discoveties are undoubtdly propitious to the mankind hand help people to grow in their traditional environment. Also, surfing the web and go online help people to connect with conventional things . To illustrate, people search on internet and purchase tradional food, clothes and even learn classic dance and music skills.
To encapsulate, after analysing both the views, I belive people shold adopt a sagacious approach while choosing the technology over tradition and culture for the holistic development and resplendent walk of life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-05 | Lucky saini | 60 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...a resonable conclusion can be drawn. As far as my views are concerned the addic...
^^
Line 3, column 111, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iden the gap amongst the proponents that vanishes the tradtion of gregariousness....
^^
Line 3, column 468, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ation of people towards western clothing ,food, creative skills ,lead to vanish th...
^^
Line 3, column 491, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... western clothing ,food, creative skills ,lead to vanish their own customs and ski...
^^
Line 5, column 403, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ople to connect with conventional things . To illustrate, people search on interne...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, so, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51937984496 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01741836403 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65503875969 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3971281881 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.666666667 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145329629048 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0445432658572 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477422334309 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0805923474748 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0266979217772 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.