Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The government should forbid violence and bad language in TV programs. Use specific reasons and examples in your answer.
Watching TV is very interesting, a hobby to a not-so-small number of people in the world. There are various programs hired on them; they include news, documentaries, different shows such as comedies, movies, and many others. All of these are watched by millions and millions of people who look up to whatever these tv programs teach them. It is for that reason that I support the idea that the government has to ban violence and bad language on TV programs.
Firstly, violence and bad language that people get to learn from watching television lead to immorality especially among the youth. Due to the attention-capturing shows hired on TVs, people tend to imitate whatever they see there even when it is not morally correct. For instance, some shows especially movies use bad language containing insults, racist words, etc, all of which get transmitted in most of the people who watch them mainly the youth leading to immorality in the way they use their languages. When the youth adapt a bad language, it is easier for others to do it too both kids (children) and adults. Young people are the future of our countries, if they get destroyed morally, the country is also damaged because they are the ones who will set an example for the upcoming generations. It is for this reason stated above that the government have to stand up and fight against tv shows with bad language as much as they can, otherwise, our country will get destroyed in front of our very eyes while no one does something to stop it.
Moreover, violence-involving tv shows may boost violence cases in society. It may not be at a great extent, but little by little, these shows contribute to inhuman acts observed in the world. As an illustration, let's take horror movies, war movies, or any other kind as long as it contains violence in them. In these movies, they simplify things which don't have to be simplified. They show that people killing each other, beating each other to death, or even shooting each other as things which are cool, but they are not. They show men raping girls as if it's nothing, but it is something. All of the above are examples of how violence in movies is depicted as things which are usual, cool, things nobody should worry about. But that is not how things should be. When people, especially the young generation, watch this, some are intrigued, they think them to be cool too, and start putting them in practice. They start exercising on their neighbors, they see people killing each other and instead of rescuing the victim, they just become bystanders and watch because that is how it is done in movies, Gladiator, being an example. As people continue putting into action what they have seen, as a result, violence cases in the society increases, people kill each other for no reason, men rape women and many others which involve the abuse of human rights. This should be abolished. The government has to put an end to it by banning TV programs of that sort.
In a nutshell, many people enjoy watching tv programs and they are truly interesting, but the government has to set boundaries on what to watch and what to not watch. This is because as TVs air programs containing the use of bad language and violence, society gets affected as people imitate them hence leading to immorality and increase of violence-related cases.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The government should forbid violence and bad language in TV programs Use specific reasons and examples in your answer 92
- Some people say that physical exercise should be a required part of every school day. Other people believe that students should spend the whole school day on academic studies. Which opinion do you agree with? Use specific reasons and details to support yo 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Reading fiction (such as novels and short stories) is more enjoyable than watching movies. Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position. 70
- Summarize the point made in the lecture and explain how the speaker cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 353, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...hese movies, they simplify things which dont have to be simplified. They show that p...
^^^^
Line 5, column 591, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: All the
...as if its nothing, but it is something. All of the above are examples of how violence in m...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, look, may, moreover, so, while, as to, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2762.0 1977.66487455 140% => OK
No of words: 580.0 407.700716846 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76206896552 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.90746259869 4.48103885553 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63466329044 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.451724137931 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 826.2 618.680645161 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.86738351254 482% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2961921206 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.48 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 15.0 3.85842293907 389% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150072311172 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546152075411 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648659821606 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111007745628 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270852106413 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 58.1214874552 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.