Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits.
Employees are the most important resources for a company. Company runs on their efforts. If employees of a company are happy and satisfied at workplace, the growth of the company would obviously be higher. Indeed, the employees, if given freedom and flexibility tend to be more efficient, connected, interested and efficacious at work. Monitoring personal things like emails could be equivalent to curtailing their freedom, which employees might not appreciate and the adverse effects could be noticed.
Monitoring emails of employees at regular basis for efficient use of company's resources and for protecting company from lawsuits seems to be a ludicrous idea because it's not going to improve resources utilization for the company rather it will discourage people at work.
Moreover, the regular monitoring of emails is going to be time consuming job, even for a small sized company with around 500 employees, checking their emails will not just spend time to monitor the emails but also waste the resources for the same and additionally doing it on a regular basis would even be more arduous task.
However, for preventing company from lawsuits proper training like GDPR, HIPAA, code-of-conduct should be provided for the employees so that they can learn and understand the need & benefit to be cautious, careful and loyal at work and being ignorant about these things could cause huge loss for the company as well as for the employees themselves.
Therefore, monitoring all emails is a strenuous piece of work which will waste the resources and time. Also, it will demoralize the employees who are more important for the company's advancement seeing their freedom getting compromised and abridged. Nevertheless, the regular training and programs which could instructive and didactic for the employees and they could learn to maintain the decorum of the company. Thus, company could be avoid compensations for lawsuits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-10 | rahulsingh773 | 50 | view |
| 2016-12-11 | tonoy | 66 | view |
- Mass media and the internet have caused people’s attention spans to get shorter. However, the overall effect has been positive: while people are less able to focus on one thing, they more than make up for it with an enhanced ability to sort through larg 62
- the best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government or industry or sports or in any field is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation than competition. 50
- TPO-07 - Integrated Writing TaskIn an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recycling 81
- Governments should invest as much in the arts as they do in. Governments should invest as much in the arts as they do in the military 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television has destroyed communication among friends and family. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinions. 70
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 58.6224719101 51% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1629.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 304.0 442.535393258 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35855263158 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82878056104 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506578947368 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 99.657608284 60.3974514979 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.75 118.986275619 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.21951772744 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24924019819 0.243740707755 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111582057765 0.0831039109588 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664555337128 0.0758088955206 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16605549141 0.150359130593 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376824530305 0.0667264976115 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 58.6224719101 51% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1629.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 304.0 442.535393258 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35855263158 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82878056104 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506578947368 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 99.657608284 60.3974514979 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.75 118.986275619 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.21951772744 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24924019819 0.243740707755 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111582057765 0.0831039109588 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664555337128 0.0758088955206 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16605549141 0.150359130593 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376824530305 0.0667264976115 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.