The given line graph illustrates the alterations in the percentages of tourists to England who visited Brighton attractions over the period 1980 to 2010.
A glimpse at the graph shows an upward trend in pier and pavilion, contrary to a downward trend in art gallery from 1980 to 2010.
In particular, the amount of tourists stood at 24% in 1980, then increasing sharply by 24% to 48% in 1995, before decreasing gradually by 18% to 30% in 2010. The trend of art gallery was similar to the pavilion. From 1980 to 1990, England witnessed a significant fluctuation, ranging from 20% to 38% accompanied by a gradually reduction of 10% to under ten percent at the end of period, 2010. The number of tourists who visited Brighton Festival reduced minimally from 30% to 25%, followed by a small growth of 3% to 28%. In term of pier, this was a slight fluctuation, ranging from 10% to 15% in first fifteen years, then rose significantly from 15% to 22% in the second half of period.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: baonguyen3011
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...allery was similar to the pavilion. From 1980 to 1990, England witnessed a signif...
^^
Line 3, column 316, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('gradually') instead an adjective, or a noun ('reduction') instead of another adjective.
... ranging from 20% to 38% accompanied by a gradually reduction of 10% to under ten percent at the end ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, then, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 803.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64161849711 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77355472883 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537572254335 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 216.0 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8587184555 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.714285714 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13755774903 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757035752098 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103707902905 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140255360213 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120874375337 0.0819641961636 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 80.96 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.