With the recent improvements to internet, people can leave views or opinions on
certain goods or services they have purchased. Is it a good or a bad thing, discuss both,
giving your own answer with examples
Because of the recent development of Internet, we can assess the products online now a days. While people putting constructive comments on services or goods in the internet can be useful, leaving fake reviews of a product can also hurt its brand value. This essay will discuss why giving people the ability to leave honest comments on a merchandise can be helpful for the betterment of it.
Authentic reviews of items can have positive impacts on them. Firstly, If people provide an honest insight of a product, it will help the organization to build the product’s image as well as its reputation among general masses. Secondly, providing honest feedback of merchandises will help people to decide whether they should buy or ignore them. For example, A lot of people purchases items from amazon which have good reviews from their buyers. Additionally, online platform gives us the chance to directly communicate with the higher management of a company about any complaints related to their products.
Leaving fake opinions can diminish a products value. Competitor of a particular company may publish dishonest feedback of particular products which may discourage a person to buy it. To illustrate, If people see a bad review about a product online, they will not buy the product believing that they will be wasting money by purchasing it. As a result, these fake reviews will minimize the sale of a particular product.
Internet has given us a wonderful ability to share our opinions about services or goods which can improve the quality of these things. However, some people tend to misuse these online features to tarnish the reputation of a company for their own gains. To recapitulate this in my opinion, providing good and honest reviews will definitely improve the value of a product.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-14 | rafsunielts2019 | 82 | view |
- In recent years, many small local shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centres or malls to do their shopping. Is this a positive or negative development? 73
- Some people prefer to shop for food in supermarkets. Other people prefer to do shopping online. Discuss both views and give your opinions. 56
- Some governments believe it is necessary to impose a higher tax on junk food because an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much of this type of food. What do you think about this? 78
- Some people think that competitive sports should be included as a subject inschool while others believe that it has a negative effect on children.Discuss both the view and give your opinion. 73
- A friend who lives in another country has invited you to come and stay with him her on your next holiday You are too busy to accept the invitation Write a letter to your friend to thank him for the invitation explain the reasons why you can t come and ask 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 82, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: nowadays
...rnet, we can assess the products online now a days. While people putting constructive comm...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 86, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
..., we can assess the products online now a days. While people putting constructive comm...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, for example, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11486486486 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76495039629 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533783783784 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0842794805 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.933333333 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7333333333 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221010242883 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807793746382 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552274122071 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145985172946 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544602046072 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.