The percentage of school aged boys in two different age groups who participated in 5 different sports in the UK in 2010.
The table chart gives information about how 5 different sports attracted boys who were in 2 aged groups in the UK in 2010.
Overall, it can be seen that boys 6-11 were active in these sports than 12-16 boys. Besides, football was considered the most favorite activity in both groups.
Regarding the boys 6-11, there were 87% of boys loved football which were twice as high as that for cricket. Basketball and rugby were also popular sports among this aged group, with 35% and 25% respectively. In contrast, the figure for swimming is lowest, with only 19%.
Looking for boys 12-16, swimming and rugby had the similar figures for participants, at around 20% each. This number was lower than that for basketball, with 25%. The most preferred sport in this group was football, with 78%, which were 44% higher than that for cricket.
- The map shows the development of an area from 1962 to present today. 73
- TOPIC: The pie chart below show global Internet users’ favorite social media platforms from 2011 to 2013. 73
- Some people think governments should spend money on faster means of public transport. However, others think money should be spent on other priorities (such as the environment). Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 67
- The table shows the number of cars made in Argentina, Australia and Thailand from 2003 and 2009. 84
- Some people think companies should employ old people to work as they have a lot of working experience. Others, however, think it is better to recruit young people.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, look, regarding, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 697.0 965.302439024 72% => OK
No of words: 143.0 196.424390244 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87412587413 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.45807182446 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33675281366 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.65034965035 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 186.3 283.868780488 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.2277479717 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.4444444444 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8888888889 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205508321362 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895931476534 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131021404491 0.0843802449381 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163961529723 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.160770089773 0.0819641961636 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.