Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should not make their social and political views known to student in the classroom. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
These days, student’s education in schools is a challenging matter. In this regard, there is a long-standing discussion among academician about the kinds of subjects which should be presented in the classroom. Some scholars believe that all aspect of life should be discuss in the class, others, however advocate the idea that specific subjects such as political views should be taught in student’s family and community and it does not relate to teachers. I personally, concur with the latter. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most important reasons.
To begin with, following teacher’s track as a tactful person may be causes forming false perspective in children. Children’s age is not proper to compare different prospective views and choose the best one. They accept their teacher as an elite person whose ideas are perfect, so they unintendedly follow their teacher’s track which may be not rational. When they become older, they may understand that they just copy their teacher with any compelling reasons. For example, when I was teenager, I had a religious teacher who talked me about her beliefs. I was impressed with her view but now, I have understood that my choice was not proper according to my characteristic. Therefore, I have started to change my perspective. This is why teachers should be careful in expressing their views not to impose their view on children.
Second, if some children feel that they have different view from their teachers, it may be lead to a strained atmosphere in the class. Students think that the way that their families thinks is perfect. If a teacher refutes their family’s attitudes, children feel that they differ from all the students in the class that makes them become unsociable in the school. The sense of being contrast with others lead to student’s weak performance in schools and feelings of hatred toward the school atmosphere. I can recall my friend in high school whose father was politician person. One time, our teacher discuss her viewpoint about politic which was completely in contrast with view of my friend’s family. My friend bothered with our teacher and her academic performance became worsen over time. Had our teacher not expressed her idea about politics, my friend would be much more successful now. This is why I support avoiding discussing controversial matters in schools.
All in all, I firmly support the view that teachers should not orient student’s idea in some matters such as political or social concepts. This is because student’s age is not sufficient enough to understand this subjects and maintaining a convenient atmosphere for any students with different cultures is essential.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-19 | ghazalsaed1995 | 76 | view |
| 2019-08-19 | ghazalsaed1995 | 76 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 272, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'discussed'?
Suggestion: discussed
...lieve that all aspect of life should be discuss in the class, others, however advocate ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 327, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s with different cultures is essential.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, for example, in contrast, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2301.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 438.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25342465753 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01168900064 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513698630137 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 678.6 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.005415593 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.875 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.91666666667 5.45110844103 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225100262655 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689090043398 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484554219779 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154289786914 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0159959588568 0.0645574589148 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.