Nowadays, we can always hear about some concerns from the public that the increasing level of various kinds of pollution influences us in many ways, such as water pollution, air pollution and so on. Someone could have been worried about whether the quality of food eaten by us today is worse than it used to be. However, in my opinion, such concerns are incorrect, and now we are enjoying more high-quality food than we used to have.
First of all, the restriction of the utilization of chemical fertilizer ensure us to harvest vegetables contained with substance which let us healthy. As we all know, the abuse of chemical fertilizer may have a significantly negative impact on soil, which makes the soil become poor. In addition, vegetables planted with chemicals taste not as healthy and delicious as planted with bio-fertilizer. For example, my hometown used to famous for its agricultural products, such as rice, peaches and pears, while the flavor of the products was plain, which had no attraction to consumers. After several years from the publishing of the restriction of utilization of chemical fertilizer, our peaches and rice have been greatly welcomed by the citizens because they are more delicious and healthier than before.
What's more, with the more restrict rules of raising animals, we can take better charge of conditions of the environment, food and other conditions related to make animals healthier. Without these controls, some potential dangerous could have been ignored by us, which may lead to serious problems. For example, my hometown is known as a famous specie of crab. However, the wild crabs living in the river have some nasty smells like gasoline. The gasoline leak from the ship is responsible for the nasty smell, which let the crabs contain toxic substance in their body. I used to hear about the news that citizens eaten wild crabs were sent to the hospital because of the toxic substance several years ago. While the domestic crabs are raised in the clean pond with controlled and safe food, which ensures their health and good tasty. Now people in my hometown prefer to eat domestic crab and almost nobody have interests in having wild one.
To sum up, with the development of technology in agricultural, it is widely acknowledged that we can enjoy healthier and more delicious food than before. So we don’t have too much necessary to worry about whether our food is healthy.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Children rely too much on the technology like computers smart phones video games for fun and entertainment Playing simpler toys or playing outside with friends would be better for children s deve 87
- When students study these days many of them also do other things at the same time for example use their phones spend time on the Internet or listen to music Do you agree or disagree that such activities have a bad effect on learning 89
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past people ate food that was better for their health than they do today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...e delicious and healthier than before. Whats more, with the more restrict rules of r...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 906, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'nobody' must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
... to eat domestic crab and almost nobody have interests in having wild one. To sum u...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, so, while, for example, in addition, such as, first of all, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2022.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 405.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99259259259 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66699129254 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528395061728 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 633.6 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7637350934 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.333333333 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05555555556 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124071713691 0.236089414692 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0421440265944 0.076458572812 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0331409024047 0.0737576698707 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0770266708821 0.150856017488 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00663524254721 0.0645574589148 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.