The provided table illustrates the amount of mobile phones, measured in millions, from five different brands are sold over a period of six years. Overall, Samsung and Apple has an upward trend, while Nokia does not show great discrepancy and the rest decrease.
As can be seen, Ericsson had the lowest number at the beginning of the period with 74 millions. Although it increased by over a quarter the following year, its figure experienced a gradual decline of 74 millions by 2012. Moreover, Motorola initially almost doubled Samsung's sales. However, its demand fell dramatically over time until reaching the lowest of just under one-third sold at the end of the period, making the figure the smallest alongside Ericsson's.
In contrast, Nokia's figures ranged from a low of 335 millions in 2012 and a high of 475 millions four years earlier. This depicted of only one-tenth reduction in sales from its initial number. Meanwhile, Samsung made it to the top of the mobile market, reaching 396.5 millions the final year, a growth which was more than three times its earliest number. For Apple, only a small fraction of 2.3 millions products were sold during its first year. Despite a slow start, the number eventually increased significantly until exceeding those of its two counterparts, Nokia and Motorola, by over 100 millions in the year 2012.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, so, third, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1132.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07623318386 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6029371926 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 106.607317073 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654708520179 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 332.1 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1872290538 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.909090909 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2727272727 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36363636364 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17763284359 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649370155904 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478483327483 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121866744104 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0307419789061 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.