Advances in technology and automation have reduced the need for manual labour. Therefore, the working hours should be reduced
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Today’s world is an era of innovations. The modernization in machinery undoubtedly eases the work of humans. However, it is debatable; the working shifts will be shortened as well. I somehow agree with the given statement. Let us dive deeper into the aspects in the coming paragraph.
To begin with, the reduced working hours will be lucrative for the employees. They will get more time, to spend with their family, this makes a balance in their personal and professional life. It will be helpful for the employees, as they feel relaxed and stress-free. This eventually, motivates them to concentrate more on their daily routine job tasks. The output is more productive, it is proven by the world economic forum’s this year report. To clarify, four days of working trial for companies was tested in New Zealand. The results were magnificent much more efficient, as compared with five days shifts.
Furthermore, cutting off working hours could decrease the enormous workload from labour. As labour is a heavy job, the body needs more rest to deal with it. This reduces the pressure from workers and they will get relief from the tiring job. Therefore, the performance of worker will be enhanced, they feel calm, composed and energetic for the next working day. Hence, they work dedicatedly with heart and soul.
To summarize, machines lessen the workload from humans but the presence of manpower is necessary to operate the machines. The working hours should be reduced for heavy jobs such as labour because their job demands more physical involvement then the machinery.
- The internet has transformed the way information is shared and consumed, but it has also created problems that did not exist before.What are the most serious problems associated with the internet and what solutions can you suggest? 84
- Influence of human beings on the world's ecosystem is leading to the extinction of species and loss of bio-diversity.What are the primary causes of loss of bio-diversity?What solutions can you suggest? 11
- Influence of human beings on the world's ecosystem is leading to the extinction of species and loss of bio-diversity.What are the primary causes of loss of bio-diversity?What solutions can you suggest? 67
- Some people believe that teaching children at home is best for a child's development while others think that it is important for children to go to school.Discuss the advantages of both methods and give your own opinion. 61
- You are living overseas and you have just come across an article about your country in a magazine where some of the information are incorrect. Write a letter to the editor. In the letter, you should: – explain that an article contains wrong information 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 240, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...r job demands more physical involvement then the machinery.
^^^^
Line 4, column 260, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hysical involvement then the machinery.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, then, therefore, well, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1327.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12355212355 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71260183822 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602316602317 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.6606881071 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 69.8421052632 106.682146367 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.6315789474 20.7667163134 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57894736842 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 3.4128256513 322% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189185717373 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599285406957 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645275515752 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123024350478 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351289790991 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 50.2224549098 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.82 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.