The working schedule has attracted much social concern. A minority of people believe that working three days a week with longer hours brings workers more enjoyable feeling than working five days a week with shorter hours. Personally, I bear in mind a strong agreement with this belief.
On the one hand, what has been put under consideration is personal enjoyment. The fact is that working three days a week creates chances for workers to obtain more time for their families. Therefore, it is possible for them to improve mutual communication with their relatives and gain a better understanding of each other. As a result, employees are bound to strengthen the bonding with other members of their families. Consequently, this plays a crucial role in promoting happiness in their lives. More importantly, it cannot be denied that spending three days a week for working possesses a large opportunity for employees to attain more time for learning other relative knowledge as well as valuable skills. It leads to a fact that there is a likelihood for them to activate their potential abilities and upgrade personal skills such as time management or communication. On that ground, needless to say, workers are capable of gradually perfect themselves and grow into a more competent person. As a consequence, they are certain to be admired by many people and be filled with satisfactory feelings. By and large, working three days a week actually helps to provide employees with more enjoyment in their lives.
On the other hand, some people might say that three days working a week with longer hours may forces employees to be too busy with a large amount of work. Accordingly, they can succumb in extreme stress. However, it is just applicable to a minority. It is widely known that, even with longer hours of working, every company always has policies to prevent their workers from stress by giving a suitable amount of task. It follows that they are able to schedule effectively to put everything under control. Furthermore, working three days a week with longer hours stands a golden chance for employees to acquire more time to socialize with others. In this case, it is expected to encourage them to have better interaction with the surrounding people and gradually enlarge their social relationship. Correspondingly, it is apparent that employees tend to exposed to varied perspectives of others and achieve a more thorough reflection of themselves. This, in turn, forms a significant contribution to their capabilities by being aware of their strengths and weaknesses. Subsequently, it is easier for workers to fill the gaps in their abilities and eventually be provided with a lot of satisfactory feeling. Beyond any doubt, the idea that working three days a week extremely stresses employees is often possible to end in collapse.
In a word, all factors mentioned above are evidence supporting my agreement. It is highly recommended that everyone should take my writing into careful consideration to make an appropriate decision on choosing employment.
- TPO 3 Independent Writing Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- TPO 54 Integrated Writing 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements?Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well. 85
- TPO 38 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- TPO 2 _ Independent TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, actually, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, well, such as, as a result, as well as, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2569.0 1977.66487455 130% => OK
No of words: 498.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15863453815 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72397222731 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93571893584 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508032128514 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 789.3 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2844261938 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8076923077 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1538461538 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.34615384615 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 11.8709677419 177% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279185768243 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775083743385 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100023588264 0.0737576698707 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178528021596 0.150856017488 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110909889849 0.0645574589148 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 86.8835125448 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.