Some people think that teachers should be responsible for teaching students to judge what is right and wrong
so that they can behave well. Others say that teachers should only teach students academic subjects.
Discuss both the view and give your opinion?
Teaching is one of the most reputed and hectic professionals at colleges and schools nowadays. While many people argue that it is teachers obligation to facilitate basic etiquette and behavior in student life. Others think that teachers are already loaded with lots of responsibility in their day-to-day curriculum as they have to cover humongous subjects because of peer pressure. I am inclined to believe that it is not the liability of teachers to help children in building their generic habit.
Ideally, it is parents the authority to provide their children's fundamental knowledge from their childhood days. Since students present in the school or colleges for a very limited amount of time. It is a very tedious task for the tutor to give the foundation to develop basic characteristics. For instance, Trends of the United Nation Education Council represents that teachers and students ratios are far less than expected. In this scenario, how come someone will expect teachers to fulfill the basic things also where they have pressure to cover a plethora of academic subjects.
Education Institutions are facing fierce competition with their peer's colleges. Every college has to perform excellently in all domain. Considering this scenario teachers have a tremendous amount of pressure so that they can complete all their associated
subjects way ahead than normal time so that they can revise recursively and perform outstandingly. For example, Some of the well-know universities like Cambridge and Oxford always wanted to be at the top of the table.
In conclusion, Guardians should be liable for developing initial etiquette in their children's because it's impossible for teachers to build these habits in a very limited period of time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-27 | shyamsingh08 | 80 | view |
- Many parts of the world are losing important natural resources, such as forest animals, or clean water. Choose one resource that is disappearing and explain why it needs to be saved. 68
- The government should reduce its investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree? 85
- Disruptive school students have a negative influence on others. Students who are noisy and disobedient should be grouped together and taught them separately. Do you agree or disagree? 70
- The lazy journalism has become commonplace in today's digitalized world. Explain what is it and the cause of it.How do you define "lazy" journalism and what is the cause? 85
- Actions speak louder than words Do you agree with this statement Discuss your views 48
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Subjects
...hey can complete all their associated subjects way ahead than normal time so that they...
^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 113, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...and perform outstandingly. For example, Some of the well-know universities like Cambridge a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 171, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...to build these habits in a very limited period of time.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38043478261 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89203978878 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605072463768 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4966571552 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.071428571 104.977214359 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 7.25397266985 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245064766549 0.242375264174 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0712923878889 0.0925447433944 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044620646784 0.071462118173 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1227626109 0.151781067708 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421130404517 0.0609392437508 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 12.6369458128 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 55.0591133005 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.