Some people believe that employers should not be concerned about the way their employees dress, but they should be concerned about the quality at work. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There has been an increasingly growing controversy regarding the significance of setting a dress code at work. While many argue that employees should be left free to pick up what they wear at work and employers should focus on the work efficiency instead, there still remain disagreements as to this issue. Overall, it is my personal view that either employees’ dress or the quality at work is equally important.
Some people view wearing a uniform irrelevant to one’s work performance and will not yield any positive effect in the workplace. While it can be true with office worker who spends most However, upfront workers, such as receptionists, should be presentable enough to receive customers or guests. Another good example is those people who meet others face-to-face wherein one’s attire may leave either good or bad impressions. This is especially true among businessmen. In these situations, even though how you present yourself with your fashion preference may not directly affect how you carry out your responsibilities, it could affect social interactions which are important in such jobs.
Only focusing on the quality of work could indeed boost productivity. But this also unfortunately takes a heavy toll on the company profitability. Being committed to the quality of work, some employees, workaholics in particular, will spend too much time improving their work performance and then pay less attention to what they should eat, how much they need to exercise and what kind of clothes they had better wear. If this lasts too long, they will suffer a sense of inferiority complex and become less confident, particularly in the world where every single individual emphasizes appearance.
In conclusion, although one’s clothing preference or dress code at work does not directly influence productivity, its relevance is worth considering depending on the nature of work.
- In many countries today people buy a range of household goods television microwave oven and rice cookers Is it a positive or negative development 57
- The map shows the development of the Chorleywood village. 11
- In many countries today, people buy a range of household goods (television, microwave, oven, and rice cookers) Is it a positive or negative development? 78
- The pie charts below show information on the highest level of education of women in Someland in 1945 and 1995 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information in the two graphs below 81
- The map shows the development of the Chorleywood village. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, regarding, so, still, then, while, as to, in conclusion, in particular, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39799331104 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07036162398 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652173913043 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.7205693731 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.153846154 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27746806667 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851377549919 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789977355468 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160641992055 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0784535739662 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.