By and large, it is a good way of teaching to commend righteous behaviors and overlook wrong or ones. But taking a close look at the conclusion that states it is the best way, the claim is too arbitrary and oversimplified.
First and foremost, the scope and range of teaching is so broad that there is no universal solution to perform the teaching tasks. Thus, it is obviously unsatisfying to conclude that appraisal of good deeds and neglect of negative ones is the best approach to teach. For example, in fields of experimental disciplines such as chemistry and pharmacology, pointing out the wrong acts in performing an experiment is at least as important as, if not more pivotal than, praising those correct manipulations, because any careless action in the experiment may lead to catastrophic consequences such as explosion of a chemical reaction or death of the animal or patient. This contradicts the assertion since there are bad or wrong actions that should not and cannot be ignored and had better be corrected immediately.
In addition, the effectiveness and excellence of teaching should be valued by the learning process and knowledge acceptance of the students. Since every person is different and teaching is better tailored to each individual to achieve best results, no uniform approach and method can satisfy every student’s need. For instance, a pupil with high self-esteem should be cautioned when he does something wrong in case he becomes too arrogant and belittles everyone else. On the contrary, one who lacks confidence may need more appraisal and encouragement to help him better build self-confidence.
Furthermore, overdue commendation and ignorance of negative deeds sometimes may cause serious problems. Numerous examples abound in our everyday life. For instance, Li Tianyi, the son of a famous Chinese artist Li Shuangjiang, grows up in all applauds and no criticisms. Once the champion of a national piano competition and a rising star in China, he was put in prison in 2012 for raping a girl with his friends. This case is extreme, but it is a caution to us of the severe consequence of undue appraisals.
To sum up, one good way of teaching is to appraise positive deeds and neglect negative ones. However, the effect of this approach should not be overestimated and is far from conclusive. To obtain effective and positive learning effects, teachers can adopt diverse teaching philosophy and methods and should tailor their approaches to different students.
- "A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimulating situations (such as an encounter with an unfamiliar monkey), firstborn infant monkeys 55
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field 58
- The vice president of human resources at Climpson Industries sent the following recommendation to the company's president."A recent national survey found that the majority of workers with access to the Internet at work had used company computers for perso 80
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 73
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 55
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 407 350
No. of Characters: 2043 1500
No. of Different Words: 236 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.492 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.02 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.942 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 154 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 126 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 99 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 55 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.611 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.766 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.722 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.277 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.524 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.066 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5