The chart below shows the information about global sales of games software, CDs and DVDs or video.
The depicted bar graph enumerates the comparative data about worldwide sales of games software, CDs as well as DVDs or video.
Overall, it is clear that DVDs/ video and game software had experienced an upward trend for over three years, whereas CDs represent a downward trend throughout the period. However, CDs make up the highest portion as compared to others.
To initiate, the most marked change had seen in 2000, where sales of CDs had reached exactly 35 billion dollars, whereas DVDs and games software were below 20 billion dollars. Moreover, in the following years 2001 and 2002, DVD/video seems to have flourished from 21 billion dollars. Similarly, games software thrived from 14 billion dollars to nearly 18 billion dollars. Likewise, CDs seem to be plunged from 34 billion dollars to 31 billion dollars.
On the contrary, CDs and game software remained stable in the year 2003. Furthermore, DVD/video seems to cross 30 billion dollars in the respective year 2003.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-01 | Milan karki | 78 | view |
- The diagram below shows the changes that have taken place at Queen Mary Hospital since its construction in 1960. 67
- Many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment. Why is this happening and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem? 61
- The chart below gives information about the most common sports played in New Zealand in 2002. 61
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the three countries from 1990 to 2004 87
- The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, likewise, moreover, similarly, so, well, whereas, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 831.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19375 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55189114923 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6375 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.2610761285 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3333333333 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7777777778 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 5.23603664747 210% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245655316141 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109351391185 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0972681865673 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1793740311 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103661423733 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.