The graph below shows information about the recruitment of teachers in Ontario between 2001 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows information about the recruitment of teachers in Ontario between 2001 and 2007.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given line graph indicates the proportion of first-year instructors who were hired to teach English and French in Ontario from 2001 to 2007. As can be seen from the graph, the percentage of French educators experienced an upward trend whereas an opposite pattern was true for the counterpart.

It is evident that at the beginning of the surveyed period, the figure for the recruitment of first-year instructors majoring in English stood at above 70%, followed by a plummet over the following two years before reaching a plateau at 40% in 2003. Afterwards, it witnessed a minimal climb to approximately 44% in the next two years . Thereafter, there existed a significant decline by about 16% in the rate of English educators who were employed in Ontario during the remaining time.

In contrast, there was a slight increase in the employment of first-year teachers in French. It saw a marked dip by nearly 20% after standing at 70% in 2001. In the following year, there was a notable growth to approximately 69% in the figure of French language educators in Ontario, followed by a continuous oscillation around 70% during the remaining part of the investigated period when it reached the peak of 73% in 2007.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-09-04 quynhhtrangg2512 73 view
2019-09-04 quynhhtrangg2512 73 view
2019-09-04 quynhhtrangg2512 78 view
2019-04-15 Mandy3456 56 view
2019-04-09 Littlebinbin 78 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by user quynhhtrangg2512 :
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 298, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e pattern was true for the counterpart. It is evident that at the beginning...
^^^^
Line 3, column 339, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... approximately 44% in the next two years . Thereafter, there existed a significant...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in Ontario during the remaining time. In contrast, there was a slight increase...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, whereas, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1013.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96568627451 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93909624444 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578431372549 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.3837832278 43.030603864 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.625 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0848716837064 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.039774426411 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0309046463086 0.0843802449381 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0612348083552 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0186530255825 0.0819641961636 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.