of the two leading brands of automobiles launched in past year, prancer cars are clearly more superior to the competing acer cars. prancer cars boast aesthetically pleasing design and a fuel economy of 30kms per gallon. in the past quarter alone, 5000 prancer cars were sold. Acer cars, on the other hand have received only a few positive reviews regarding thier overall performances. I have personally test driven both brand cars and I strongly recomment that you buy a prancer car for superior performance at an affordable price.
The author concludes by saying that the buying a prancer car for superior performance at an affordable price is better than purchasing the Acer cars. I strongly disagree with the authors conclusion. This i say because the author does not give the enough data required to compare cars between them for their performance. I shall suggest the ways to improve the reasoning so that the argument has some validity.
First of all, the argument assumes the that there are only two car brands available for the customers to buy in the market. There can be many other car brands which might be better than any of this two. Maybe they are also providing the other occasional benefits for the customers along with the extended maintenance time period. Thus the author should first give the complete details on to where this both brands stand in open market. This will help the buyer to have more vivid options to choose among the top brands.
Secondly, the author only provides the details of prancer cars and not of the Acer cars. Maybe Acer cars are not that aesthetically pleasing this maybe because the company wanted to have control over the overall price of the car which is making them more affordable than the prancer cars. Moreover, the author also does not give us the efficiency of the Acer cars to consider the prancer cars as more fuel economical.Thus the author needs to give detailed information on both the cars for us to consider buying the best suited car.
Lastly, the author also does not give the complete details of the reviewers. Maybe this were the only people who were known to author among the many people who were happy with the Acer car. This then makes the Acer car better than the Prancer cars. Thus the author needs to give the enough data on the people reviewed to consider this survey as reliable.
Hence I conclude that the reasoning is flawed and that the author should give the enough data for us to select among this car brands. I believe that the argument would vastly improve if author makes the reasonable conclusion on the complete data and not incomplete or insufficient data.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-04 | anant naik | 63 | view |
- Today it is clear that our increasing use of technology has caused more harm than good to mankind. 50
- of the two leading brands of automobiles launched in past year, prancer cars are clearly more superior to the competing acer cars. prancer cars boast aesthetically pleasing design and a fuel economy of 30kms per gallon. in the past quarter alone, 5000 pra 63
- The Primary purpose of the education is to get a job. 50
- Environmental protection policies should not be applicable to corporations, which generate significant financial and economic growth, even if such growth may have a negative impact on the environment. 50
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 370 350
No. of Characters: 1712 1500
No. of Different Words: 158 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.386 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.627 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.238 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 112 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 70 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 48 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 24 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.556 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.207 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.611 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.364 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.578 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.15 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 180, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...Acer cars. I strongly disagree with the authors conclusion. This i say because the auth...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 205, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...agree with the authors conclusion. This i say because the author does not give th...
^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that the argument has some validity. First of all, the argument assumes the t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 331, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...h the extended maintenance time period. Thus the author should first give the comple...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tions to choose among the top brands. Secondly, the author only provides the d...
^^^^
Line 9, column 418, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Thus
...he prancer cars as more fuel economical.Thus the author needs to give detailed infor...
^^^^
Line 9, column 418, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...he prancer cars as more fuel economical.Thus the author needs to give detailed infor...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... consider buying the best suited car. Lastly, the author also does not give th...
^^^^
Line 13, column 250, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... Acer car better than the Prancer cars. Thus the author needs to give the enough dat...
^^^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to consider this survey as reliable. Hence I conclude that the reasoning is f...
^^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ider this survey as reliable. Hence I conclude that the reasoning is flawed...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, lastly, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, thus, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.6327345309 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.9520958084 54% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 11.1786427146 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 13.6137724551 88% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 28.8173652695 97% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 55.5748502994 67% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 16.3942115768 43% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1765.0 2260.96107784 78% => OK
No of words: 369.0 441.139720559 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78319783198 5.12650576532 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.56307096286 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33229284123 2.78398813304 84% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 204.123752495 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.428184281843 0.468620217663 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 545.4 705.55239521 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 19.7664670659 91% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8423940095 57.8364921388 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0555555556 119.503703932 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 23.324526521 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 5.70786347227 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 5.25449101796 209% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.67664670659 128% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195672939008 0.218282227539 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742721496377 0.0743258471296 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790703361138 0.0701772020484 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120335998594 0.128457276422 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0841675586858 0.0628817314937 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.3799401198 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.3550499002 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.197005988 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.5979740519 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.32208582834 87% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 98.500998004 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.